Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Genocide of thinking

By David Young - posted Wednesday, 25 March 2009


And so we can invade, kill and destroy cultures without any personal responsibility. We can do this because we are “right” in converting the subdued to our religion and saving their souls. Or maybe we slaughter hundreds of thousands of people to bring peace and stability to the region. All it takes is to be right.

In Australia, we have many people in the “white” Abrahamic society who are experts about customs and ways of our indigenous peoples. But we understand nothing about our indigenous population because white people cannot think “indigenous”. It is a way of thinking outside white understanding and a way of thinking white Australia is destroying with right and wrong. It is probably too late to stop the process in Australia because Abrahamic thinking has infected the Indigenous population to the extent that it cannot recover.

When Christianity over came Gnostic thought, it is probable that it wasn't just a case of two Abrahamic systems fighting over right and wrong - with one side victorious. It is more likely that the Gnostic form of thinking was not originally an Abrahamic system. It was a system of the Gnosis of truth coming from within. We can only surmise that this could have been a way of thinking based on trusting intuition. Although this may not be correct because it is based on judgment, it does illustrate that there are other forms of thinking other than the system that is commonly used in our society.

Advertisement

For example, the Cathar way of thinking, and the philosophical principles which went with it, were wiped out in the Genocide of the Cathars by the Christian church.

There is a standard set move Abrahamic thinking uses to destroy anyone who dares think differently to what is sanctioned by the “thought police”. It is a simple but effective method; because there is no defence.

The first part of the three-part move is a campaign of lies and misinformation. If this is executed skillfully, the victim has no way of proving the lies are lies and the misinformation unfounded. Use the principle that people will accept something as true because it cannot be proved to be false.

The second part is to raise the lies and misinformation that are now circulating freely to the level of fear and loathing. The third part is to destroy. The fear and loathing the people now have for the victim thanks to the second part will ensure that there will be no opposition to this third and final phase.

This system worked against Wicca (witchcraft); Hitler used it against the Jewish people; and it is the standard sure fire way of destroying anyone who dares to think for themselves or differs from the accepted norm.

When the victim has been destroyed all that is left are the lies and misinformation. All we think we know about Gnosticism, Wicca, and the Cathars is mostly the residual of such lies and misinformation spread by Christianity.

Advertisement

The two main issues for the West at the moment are climate change and the global financial crisis. The debates on both these issues are being fought on Abrahamic principles. Lies on lies, Misinformation followed by more misinformation, none of which can be proved or disproved. Any science that could give some guidance is taken, distorted, and fed back as misinformation; but with each side using their particular version of the science to try and gain the higher ground, claiming they are right and the other side wrong.

If there was any thinking involved in the climate change debate, the protagonists would understand that right and wrong does not matter. What matters is sorting out what is happening and what response (if any) is required.

Abrahamic thinking is not really thinking at all. It requires no active requirement of reasoned response. What it requires is to destroy anyone or anything that does not agree with the dogma of the particular club you belong to.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

34 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Young has been a writer for 20 years. At other times he has been an architect and a flying instructor. Details of his books and writings can be found at his website davidyoungauthor.com

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 34 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy