Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

An unsustainable future

By Tom Quirk - posted Thursday, 19 February 2009


In summary, the proposal for renewable power is unachievable. It is unachievable in terms of installation, present transmission network capacity and present market operation.

In addition it is an economic folly where the use of natural gas would substantially reduce carbon dioxide emissions, provide energy when needed and save some $40 billion in expenditure.

So why not follow the example of the United Kingdom and convert some thermal power stations from coal to natural gas? This would be a short term fix. Long term this would be a misuse of a vital industrial feedstock.

Advertisement

None of this addresses the second of the Federal Governments schemes for reducing carbon emissions.

So we now have both a projected reduction in demand from thermal power stations as the available wind energy sources increase but also a carbon emissions tax. This can be described in one word as a shambles with wind power subsidies to continue at a state and federal government level. These schemes will presumably be merged at some time.

There have been a number of detailed analyses of the generators supplying power in the National Electricity Market i.e. South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland (NEM). These show that Victoria has the cheapest marginal cost electricity and the best planned system of generators. A comparison with NSW is quite shocking. The load on the Latrobe Valley generators is 88 per cent of their installed capacity of 6,000MW while NSW has a load of 65 per cent for its three largest generators with total capacity of 7,300MW. If NSW generators operated at the Victorian level it would be the equivalent of a new 1,900MW generator! This would be a major reduction in the need to construct more power stations.

The imposition of a tax, if it were set at $25 per tonne of emitted CO2, would make the Victorian generators marginal cost base the same as that of the NSW generators. This is a reflection of the use of brown coal in Victoria. However, in each of these states there would be a tax of some $1.7 billion.

This tax would remove any cheap power advantage Victoria currently enjoys while making power more expensive for consumers and threatening the viability of coal burning power stations. It provides no incentive for the future development of a well managed and economically responsible power supply system.

These policies will be subject to the claims of special interest groups and “politically correct” technology.

Advertisement

It is no wonder that large tax concessions have been proposed for the coal burning power stations. As Mrs Thatcher has said: “TINA” (there is no alternative)!

Wind farm reliability: power curve for South Australian wind farms from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. The capacity factor or average output is 33 per cent of total capacity of 307MW. The 90 per cent reliability figure is 7 per cent.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All
Advertisement
 Institute of Public Affairs Advertisement

 

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

42 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tom Quirk is a director of Sementis Limited a privately owned biotechnology company. He has been Chairman of the Victorian Rail Track Corporation, Deputy Chairman of Victorian Energy Networks and Peptech Limited as well as a director of Biota Holdings Limited He worked in CRA Ltd setting up new businesses and also for James D. Wolfensohn in a New York based venture capital fund. He spent 15 years as an experimental research physicist, university lecturer and Oxford don.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tom Quirk

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 42 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Institute of Public Affairs
 No reality holiday from this population challenge
 For budgets only smaller is tougher
 Government subsidies to green groups must end
 Boot-strapping on a carbon tax
 West's history not complete without reference to Christianity
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy