Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

On Rudd’s prognostications

By Greg Barns and Daniel Liptak - posted Friday, 6 February 2009


Rudd’s bailout of the Australian banks - an outrageous benefit - is potent evidence of the danger of politicians and governments seeking to replace the market as the agent of capital placement. Bloomberg reported on February 2 that “Australian banks may have saved at least $500 million in the two months since Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s government started guaranteeing their bonds, freeing up money to help restore finances battered by the credit crunch.” All of which is great if you are a shareholder, but not if you are a taxpayer.

But just as obscene as Mr Rudd’s charitable giving program for the banks, has been his government’s pandering to the whims of the industry that has turned rent-seeking into an art form, the car industry. Twice since being elected to office in 2007, has the Prime Minister written out big cheques for the nation’s car makers. Meanwhile, as Tim Colebatch observed in The Age on February 4, Mr Rudd’s anti neo-liberal economic package released this week does nothing for the victims of the recession.

“Those who need it are the poor people who bear the cost of the recession on behalf of the rest of us: workers who lose their jobs, apprentices laid off, youngsters who can't even get into the labour market, and businesses and self-employed people who go broke. There is nothing in this package for them,” Colebatch wrote.

Advertisement

And this man spent his Christmas holidays - or so he boasts - penning a show off piece for a magazine on what a kind, compassionate social democrat he is, and how nasty are the neo-liberals.

Kevin Rudd’s The Monthly essay is intellectually lazy and seriously flawed. It’s a first year undergraduate exercise which, if it hadn’t been written by K. Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia, would probably have been stripped back to a few hundred words in the letters section.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

23 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Greg Barns is National President of the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

Daniel Liptak is Head of Alternatives research at Zenith Partners.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Greg Barns
All articles by Daniel Liptak

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 23 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy