Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Why make a jigsaw puzzle of the lower Murray?

By Diane Bell and Keith Walker - posted Monday, 2 February 2009


Why then are we presented with piecemeal plans to address the Lower Lakes crisis? Members of the public have been asked to respond to several proposals launched in rapid succession over the holiday season.

Why is there so little indication of how one proposal might impact upon another? The case for the Pomanda weir, for example, will gain strength if seawater is also brought into Lake Alexandrina, because saline intrusions could contaminate water intended for domestic supply.

Crisis or not, we need an integrated plan for our responses. How credible can the process of environmental impact assessment be without it? How might the plans for seawater and weirs limit our options for better management in future?

Advertisement

Onus’ painting from Yorta Yorta country signals the dangers of fragmentation of the environment and our relationship with the land and water. The government’s proposals to overcome the Lower Lakes crisis are questionable because they have been developed in haste and fail to see that the goal should be to engineer not the environment, but our relationship with the environment.

Other, less draconian solutions could ensure that we can all enjoy “the big picture” for years to come. Some possibilities are outlined in a Low Intervention Strategy developed by the River, Coorong and Lakes Action Group Inc.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Diane Bell retired as Professor Emerita of Anthropology at George Washington University in 2005 and returned home to Australia to write but was soon swept up in the struggle to return the MDB to health. Diane has published ten books including Daughters of the Dreaming and Ngarrindjeri Wurruwarrin and numerous articles. Her current research is amongst the peoples she calls the 'Water Tribe'. Professor Bell is currently Writer and Editor in Residence at Flinders University and Visiting Professor in the School of Social Sciences at the University of Adelaide.

Keith Walker is an environmental consultant and Adjunct Associate Professor in the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences at The University of Adelaide.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Diane Bell
All articles by Keith Walker

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy