Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Health inequality

By Peter Curson - posted Monday, 22 December 2008


There also seems little doubt that the health sector remains massively under-resourced in many countries producing a substantial mismatch between broad expectations and actual performance. Globally, annual government expenditure on health varies from as little as $US20 per person to well over $US6, 000. Striking inequalities also exist throughout the world in access to health and health care and what people have to pay for care. For billions of people in low and middle income countries, more than 50 per cent of all health care expenditure must be met from personal resources.

Of approximately 136 million women expected to give birth this year in the world, 58 million will receive no medical care or assistance. Equally striking differences in life expectancy between the richest and the poorest countries continue to persist and the gap now exceeds 40 years. In Australia and New Zealand, life expectancy now exceeds 82 years. In parts of sub-Saharan Africa life expectancy remains below 45 years.

In an unequal world a return to primary health care principles would seem more relevant than ever before. Quite possibly, inequalities in health care are today much more marked than they were 30 years ago, and that is a major failing of world societies. We now live at a time of increasing polarisation of many societies where the well-off are generally healthier and have the best access to health care, while those at the other end of the socio-economic spectrum have much poorer health and are largely left to cope for themselves. Even in our own society we see evidence of this polarisation albeit on a more moderate scale.

Advertisement

In the final analysis, the WHO report argues that all societies must aim to diminish inequalities in health, eliminate all forms of health exclusion, develop health care systems that reflect people’s needs and expectations and become responsive to changing societal circumstances, to ultimately ensure that health care is available to all. The past 30 years suggests that we have made some progress in achieving these aims, but not nearly enough.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Curson is Emeritus Professor of Population and Health in the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences at Macquarie University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Peter Curson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Curson
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy