Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The major parties' X-files are keeping odds stacked in favour of MPs

By Wayne Errington and Peter Van Onselen - posted Friday, 24 October 2003


For example, the groundswell of public opinion over last year's ASIO legislation caused the Government to modify its position. Angry phone calls over that draconian piece of legislation were noticed by the Government (just remember your MP has caller ID, so anonymity is difficult). On the other hand, despite much public opposition to Australia's participation in the war against Iraq, Government members backed the Prime Minister in the knowledge that their seats were never under threat.

Databases are all about helping political parties ensure that their messages are relevant to the recipients. The big parties are already spending less money on broadcast advertising and diverting their resources towards more targeted campaigns.

Electoral databases are a powerful and invasive political tool. Political parties are exempted from privacy legislation because they are political parties, and, paradoxically, are also exempt from freedom of information legislation because they are private organisations. All citizens must be free to take their concerns about government policy to their local MP, confident that their private details will not be used for partisan advantage.

Advertisement

Personal details of electors should not be available to the central offices of political parties. We should all have the right to know what our elected representatives have on file about us.

The unwillingness of the major parties to publicly discuss their electoral databases is understandable but not acceptable. Well over a decade after their introduction, it is time to shed some light on this crucial development in Australian politics.

Write to your local MP about this issue. Just be very careful what you say.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Sydney Morning Herald on 21 October 2003. It is based on a paper presented to the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference in Hobart. Click here for the full text.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Dr Wayne Errington lectures in politics at the Australian National University. His book, co authored with Peter Van Onselen, John Winston Howard: The Biography (Melbourne University Press), is due for release later this year.

Dr Peter van Onselen is Associate Professor of Politics and Government School of Communications and Arts at Edith Cowan University in Perth, Western Australia.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Wayne Errington
All articles by Peter Van Onselen
Related Links
Australian Labor Party
Australiasian Political Studies Association Conference
Liberal Party of Australia
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy