Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Legally correct but morally reprehensible

By John von Doussa - posted Wednesday, 15 October 2008


What I would like to see is a new approach to making law and policy that doesn’t ignore the human rights picture. I would like to see the legislature focus on solving existing human rights problems and preventing human rights problems from happening in the future.

The federal Government has proposed to hold a public consultation about how best to protect human rights and freedoms in Australia. I believe it should be welcomed for one simple reason. In a country where every night more than 100,000 people are homeless, and Indigenous Australians still die 17 years earlier than their non-Indigenous counterparts, we can and should do better.

I am now convinced that the best way to ensure that all three arms of government - the executive, the legislature and the judiciary - take care when they make decisions that impact on basic human rights is to introduce a statutory charter of rights. As a Federal Court judge, I did not see the need.

Advertisement

The old argument that the current system is working well just does not stand up.

Opponents of a charter should spend less time glossing over the inadequacies of our current arrangements and more time formulating positive proposals to better protect people for whom the enjoyment of basic rights are still out of reach.

We should not forget the children taken away and the laws that punish the kids of same-sex families. And we should not forget the damage to Australia’s international reputation that occurs when we fail to practice what we preach.

A statutory charter should not allow Courts to strike down laws that are incompatible with human rights. However, if we are serious about implementing our international obligations, we should give Courts the power to provide meaningful remedies to individuals who are victims of human rights violations.

The suggestion that these kinds of arrangements will encourage judicial activism is simply scaremongering. The interpretation of human rights by the judiciary will occur in accordance with the predictable traditions of legal reasoning.

I believe - perhaps optimistically - that the main obstacle to improving human rights protection in Australia is not a lack of care, but a lack of understanding.

Advertisement

If this proposed Inquiry into human rights protection can engage ordinary Australians with the kind of human rights issues that came across my desk in the last five years, the case for change might just succeed.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

The Hon John von Doussa QC is the President, Acting Sex Discrimination Commissioner and Commissioner responsible for Age Discrimination Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John von Doussa

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy