Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Four rules for reform

By George Williams - posted Friday, 3 October 2008


If students of constitutional law are turned off, what hope is there for the rest of the population? Before the Prime Minister asks Australians to vote at a referendum, he should ensure that people have access to fair and credible information.

Third, Australians should be given more engagement with constitutional reform than simply being asked to rubberstamp an amendment at the ballot box. Voting on referendum day should be preceded by a process that gives Australians a genuine opportunity to participate in and shape the change. The community needs to feel that they own the proposal for which they are being asked to vote. Too often, people feel as if a referendum is being imposed on them, and vote no as a result. After all, if an idea has been drafted and championed by politicians, people are liable to believe that it is being pursued for self-serving reasons. Significantly, one of the most successful slogans of the 1999 republic referendum was ''vote no to the politicians' republic''.

Fourth, the change to the Constitution must be sound and sensible. The proposal must be necessary, usually in the sense of being needed to fix a serious problem or to provide an important new opportunity for the nation. The idea should also have been road-tested and developed by people that the community trust.

Advertisement

It should go without saying that the reform must be free of defects and drafting problems. Unfortunately, some of the ideas put to the people have had significant weaknesses. Even after years of debate on the republic, the 1999 model contained a flawed mechanism for the dismissal of the president that attracted criticism from both monarchists and republicans. Australians are not likely to support a change to their Constitution unless they are confident that it is not only needed, but safe.

Constitutional reform is achievable. Indeed, Australia must improve its blueprint of government in areas such as federalism if we are to have an adequate foundation for our future prosperity. The lessons from the many failed referendums are clear. They simply need to be heeded so that any future proposal put by the Rudd Government to the Australian people stands a good chance of success.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Canberra Times on September 27, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

George Williams is the Anthony Mason Professor of law and Foundation Director of the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law at the University of New South Wales.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by George Williams

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of George Williams
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy