Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Indigenous good governance begins with communities and institutions

By Jackie Huggins - posted Monday, 13 October 2003


Researchers involved in the Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development started out, some 15 years ago now, with assumptions about what might work and what mightn't in the governance of Indigenous communities.

What is fundamental about the Harvard research is that its findings are counterintuitive. They defy all assumptions about the foundation of good governance, in particular the assumption that if communities have access to viable economies, if they occupy land with a strong resource base, if they have relationships with mining companies and access to royalties, they surely have all the incentive they need to become healthy communities.

What the research has found is that communities with immediate access to those kinds of resources and supports actually fall over more often than communities that analyse their cultural base and build governance structures upon that base.

Advertisement

Communities that make a conscious decision to go back to the beginning and explore where their institutions are out of sync with their cultures - not only traditional culture but the day-to-day culture of how the community actually operates - are the ones that prosper over the long term.

The direct relevance of this research to native title could hardly be clearer.

For too long, we've operated on the assumption that if you've got native title, your community is going to be OK. But what we've been seeing over the years is that organisations, including native title representative bodies and communities themselves, who have had the responsibility of managing benefits associated with native title simply haven't had the capacity to do it effectively for the benefit of the people.

The caution we have to make about the Harvard work, is that while the research holds important lessons and parallels for Australia, for us to think we can import it outright would be inappropriate and lazy.

Which is why Reconciliation Australia is coordinating a groundbreaking project with BHP Billiton to identify and promote all the different aspects that constitute good Indigenous governance in Australia.

This project has particular resonance at the moment when there is so much attention being paid to Aboriginal organisations being dysfunctional, when there is so much soul searching going on among the Indigenous leadership about the responsibility and legitimacy of that leadership.

Advertisement

Its central focus is to work with Indigenous organisations and communities and, where appropriate, with governments to imbed Indigenous governance as a coordinated, bipartisan, national strategy beyond the electoral cycle that sees policies come and go.

Our hope is that in the first five years, we can build up a body of work that demonstrates the value of working with communities on their own terms and over time to generate sustainable improvements for Indigenous people.

We would hope to prove that good governance leads to significantly improved prospects for economic independence. And also to make it clear that the equation doesn't necessarily work in reverse - economic independence, with or without native title, doesn't necessarily lead to good governance.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This is an exract from a speech given to the 10th Annual Cultural Heritage and Native Title Conference, held in Brisbane on 30 September 2003.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jackie Huggins is Deputy Director of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research Unit at the University of Queensland and Co-chair of Reconciliation Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jackie Huggins
Related Links
Reconciliation Australia
University of Queensland ATSISU
Photo of Jackie Huggins
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy