Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The business of Indigenous affairs

By Kevin Andrews - posted Monday, 25 August 2008


An innovative, responsive, agile approach

Shared Responsibility Agreements and Indigenous Co-ordination Centres were at the heart of a new more innovative, and responsive approach to Indigenous Affairs that began under the Howard government. Indigenous communities could nominate initiatives, programs and policies that they need and want from the different Federal agencies through the ICCs in a monitored whole-of-government approach. In return, Indigenous communities had to negotiate some mutual obligation requirements.

For Indigenous affairs, this represented an enormous shift in public service practice and delivery. The progress made, for example, with “no school, no pool” initiatives was heartening. Witness the rapid decline of trachoma among the young in the Mulan community following its “washing-faces-for-a-new-petrol-bowser” deal with the government. Communities appeared to be enthusiastic.

Moving ahead with cautious optimism

Australian policy makers have been slow to realise that private property ownership and workforce participation would be healthy for Indigenous peoples. Despite the gains in land rights, the capacity for greater economic independence was diminished.

Advertisement

What is needed is an ongoing commitment to an Indigenous Economic Independence Strategy, based on two underlying considerations: first, rejecting the notion that Indigenous people are lesser economic beings; second, challenging a welfare culture in favour of an entrepreneurial culture. This is as noble a cause as political equality or addressing dispossession.

The way out of welfare is to build workforce participation and to find the economic and social multipliers that create opportunity and reduce hardship. The way forward needs effective public service delivery of education, health and other essential services. At the same time, recognising some labour markets are limited. Programs of community development should remain an integral component of the new approach; but not  becoming a substitute for real economic participation.

More Indigenous Australians must be given hope and opportunities to participate in the market and economy. Prerequisites for Indigenous economic independence include: gaining a job, owning property, building future generation wealth. If practical reconciliation means anything, it means this.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Kevin Andrews is the federal Member for Menzies (Vic) and a former Minister in the Howard Liberal government.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kevin Andrews

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kevin Andrews
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy