Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Every person is precious

By Elenie Poulos - posted Monday, 11 August 2008


In Victoria it has, in fact, been the Parliament itself, and not the courts, that has been most active in considering if legislation is consistent with the basic human rights contained within the Charter. It is the job of The Scrutiny of Acts and Regulation Committee in the Victorian Parliament to assess how new legislation complies with the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act. So far only one Bill put forward by the Victorian Government has been modified on the basis of comments made by the committee, although committee itself has recommended changes to 23 bills in order that they better comply with the Charter.

Having some form of Commonwealth human rights legislation would mean that the government (both the bureaucracy and the Federal Parliament) would have comprehensive legislation against which to assess their development of public policy rather than just the odd grab-bag of legislation that exists now (such as the Racial Discrimination Act). It is instructive (and may even be comforting to those who worry about such legislation) to note that the Parliament determined to override the Racial Discrimination Act in the development of the Northern Territory Emergency Response Legislation.

The Uniting Church believes that the process of developing an Australian human rights charter should begin with widespread and effective community and stakeholder consultation and we have committed ourselves to engage positively in any such public consultation. We look forward to the Government’s announcement of the consultation process.

Advertisement

There are many, many reasons why a national human rights charter would be good for Australia but, ultimately, the Uniting Church will support such an initiative because we believe that every person is precious and deserves a decent chance in life and because we believe that we have a deep and abiding responsibility to ensure that our society is based on principles of social justice and equity.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rev. Elenie Poulos is a Minister of the Uniting Church in Australia and National Director of UnitingJustice Australia which is an agency of the Church’s National Assembly responsible for the development of policy, advocacy and education on issues of social justice, peace and the environment.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Elenie Poulos

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Elenie Poulos
Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy