Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Countering a climate of scepticism

By Roger Jones - posted Monday, 4 August 2008


In this context, we need to understand what a climate model is: a conceptual construct of how a system works, in this case Earth. Many people, when they think of models, straight away turn to mathematical models. However, because everybody views the world as a set of concepts, we use models all the time.

A scientific model differs from an everyday conceptual model by being a systematic framework of observation, hypothesis, experiment and review of hypotheses.

The last two steps are critical in qualifying a model as scientific. Climate models are continually subjected to testing and revision in the light of new evidence. Most significantly, when statistical principles are violated to discount a scientific model, a red flag should go up: what is being violated is common sense.

Advertisement

Those who wish to discount this scientific effort are driven by their own ideologically dominated models, which are unreviewed, unaccountable and unverifiable. They should be disregarded.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

This article has been reproduced with permission of CSIRO. It was first published in The Australian on July 30, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

63 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Roger Jones is a CSIRO principal research scientist and a co-ordinating lead author in the IPCC fourth assessment report. He assisted the Garnaut review in interpreting climate change science.

Article Tools
Comment 63 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy