Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Countering a climate of scepticism

By Roger Jones - posted Monday, 4 August 2008


According to NASA data, 2007, during a La Nina (normally colder than average), was similar in temperature to 1998.

When we know that two events are similar, if one associated with temporary cooling occurs a decade after another associated with temporary warming, there must be an underlying upward trend. This is science.

Second, arguments that climate models are fatally flawed means jettisoning the science that underpins the models, which in turn means having to jettison our understanding of environmental and earth science.

Advertisement

The development of climate models, earth system science and global observing systems has been inextricably linked since the 1950s.

This understanding underpins our standard of living and, ultimately, human interactions with the environment. It is the same science that underpins the future of the global economy.

Scientific models are used to review what we are measuring and what it tells us. For example, taking Earth's temperature is very difficult, so meteorologists measure air temperature 1.5m above the ground, using thermometers in shade.

Standards are maintained but these are not perfect. So, to create a homogenous record and extend our record to non-standard measurements taken in the past, we must make adjustments. The World Meteorological Organisation has technical standards for this task.

The second step is to link that record of air temperature with other environmental observations. Scientists develop and apply models of plant growth, of physiological response among animals, and of the physical performance of materials.

These models are validated by measurements in the lab and in the field.

Advertisement

All environmental observations need to be adjusted in some way, and we use scientific models to do so. Such understanding underpins weather forecasting, agricultural production systems, the management of natural hazards and so on.

These relationships are also critical to our understanding of future climate risks.

Claims that that this task is not carried out with the utmost care and with the appropriate scientific scepticism cannot be supported.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article has been reproduced with permission of CSIRO. It was first published in The Australian on July 30, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

63 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Roger Jones is a CSIRO principal research scientist and a co-ordinating lead author in the IPCC fourth assessment report. He assisted the Garnaut review in interpreting climate change science.

Article Tools
Comment 63 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy