Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The housing market needs a long-term plan and a review of negative gearing

By Andrew Murray - posted Monday, 6 October 2003


Home ownership is falling. It is harder than ever for younger or poorer Australians to become homeowners.

More than 60 per cent of renters on low or moderate incomes pay unaffordable rents (more than 30 per cent of their income). There is dwindling supply of low-cost housing.

Negative gearing has forced us into a highly variable and unresponsive housing market. In other countries there is a stronger positive relationship between capital value and rental returns than in Australia.

Advertisement

In Australian capitals and main regional cities it is not possible to get a positive return on investment without negative gearing at the highest marginal tax rate - even with strong capital growth. That means that companies paying 30 per cent tax cannot possibly make residential housing work as an investment.

We need to construct a different, less volatile housing market and one that does not result in prices beyond the reach of most Australians.

Key workers - nurses, train drivers and service industry workers - are already saying that it is too expensive to live in Sydney. Our largest city will not be viable if we cannot house key workers. That's a reality that has to be faced and which government cannot afford to ignore.

The Australian Democrats would like to see a housing market that tames the beast while still providing investment opportunities for Australian investors, one that maintains affordability across the board, and a supply of new housing that is sufficient to meet demand.

A mix of investment subsidies that are targeted specifically to affordable rental including additional investment in new types of public and community rental housing could address the significant failings in our private rental markets.

A national housing plan that sets realistic social and economic goals within a long time frame is required and a review of negative gearing should rightly and properly be a part of that. The question is - are the government or the opposition ever going to be brave enough to take on the challenge?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by John Carrigan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Senator Andrew Murray is Taxation and Workplace Relations Spokesperson for the Australian Democrats and a Senator for Western Australia.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Andrew Murray
Related Links
Andrew Murray's home page
Andrew Murray's parliamentary home page
Photo of Andrew Murray
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy