Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Rudd and Wongs emissions trading choice

By Christine Milne - posted Monday, 21 July 2008


In the coming months before the emissions trading legislation comes before the Senate, the Rudd Government needs to think hard about what it is trying to achieve.

Does it plan to buy into the lowest common denominator populism of the Coalition? This approach drags the debate backwards, undermines the global climate fight, and risks alienating a significant portion of Labor’s own base who voted for leadership on climate.

Or will it lead from the front, inspiring Australians to embrace this challenge to rebuild, upgrade and retool for a zero emissions future? Will it appeal to people’s best instincts, articulating a positive vision of preparing ourselves for the future by investing in a systemic roll-out of energy efficiency, mass transit and renewable energy?

Advertisement

The final answer will be in the 2020 target that is promised in the legislation by the end of the year, but the signals from yesterday’s Green Paper were decidedly worrying. The Paper was framed entirely around costs and cash compensation instead of the opportunities for transformation we Greens have been advocating.

The Canberra insider view, surprisingly articulated even by the eminently sensible Bernard Keane last week, is that, while the Greens position makes perfect sense, it is politically unacceptable and won’t pass muster with the electorate. This is a leftover from the Howard years where good policy was abandoned in favour of pandering to special interests and appealing to base populism was seen as effective politics.

I don’t believe that that is the case anymore. The Canberra insiders are completely misreading the level of anxiety in the community about the science of climate change and the awareness that, if we don’t act now, there will be nothing that we can do to avoid runaway climate change when the politicians finally wake up.

All around the country, I and my colleagues are accosted by people demanding to know what we are going to do to help them reduce their emissions. Why isn’t the Government helping them install insulation and solar water heating, they want to know. Why isn’t the Government embracing the smart, baseload solar technologies that we are exporting to the US and Spain? What are the Greens going to do about it? They feel that handing out cash compensation while doing nothing to bring on alternatives is cruelly setting them up for a fall when the crunch comes.

Voters were outraged by the capturing of the Howard government by the greenhouse mafia. They will be equally outraged by the Rudd Government’s capture and storage in the pockets of the coal sector. This is the one and only case where I am hoping for leakage!

Emissions trading is supposed to go hand in hand with a suite of measures to unleash creativity and innovation and stimulate investment in the zero emissions alternatives. Instead, we have every mechanism imaginable to protect existing investments. The Green Paper even proposes free permits and cash handouts to protect investment in coal generators. This will deaden any stimulus to invest in the much-needed new infrastructure for renewables and energy efficiency.

Advertisement

Just as with increasing the price of petrol with one hand and decreasing it by the same amount with the other, the government has put its foot on the brake and accelerator at the same time. The wheels are spinning madly, we’re burning up fuel, and we’re going precisely nowhere.

Prime Minister Rudd and Minister Wong would do well to read Nelson Mandela’s first lesson of leadership, in last week’s Time Magazine: “courage is not the absence of fear, but the ability to inspire people to move beyond fear.”

Rudd and Wong are so paralysed by fear that, for all their talk of transformation, they are clinging to the past. The community has moved well past the Government towards the Greens position, opening the field for courageous leadership.

Rudd and Wong would do well to consider this before bringing legislation before the Senate that gets the support of the Coalition but loses the community.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

First published in Crikey and on the Greens Blog on July 17, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

47 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Christine Milne is the Australian Greens' spokeswoman on energy and climate change.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Christine Milne

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Christine Milne
Article Tools
Comment 47 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy