Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Not all change is bad

By Rodney Croome - posted Tuesday, 15 July 2008


Why aren’t Presbyterians allowed to have sex standing up? Because it can lead to dancing.

It’s an old joke but one that perfectly sums up the fears of those who oppose change: if you relax one rule who knows where it will lead.

This slippery-slope mentality is what’s behind the fear that allowing same-sex couples to marry will lead to the recognition of other marital arrangements like polygamy.

Advertisement

Opponents of change say if marriage is all about love and commitment then what about the love and commitment between one man and his four wives?

There’s an element of hypocrisy and mischief-making in this rhetorical question.

Often those who oppose same-sex marriage justify themselves by referring to “biblical values”, conveniently ignoring the fact that the Bible is full of polygamous relationships.

They also talk a lot about marriage being for “procreation”, again ignoring the fact that multiple wives makes for hordes of kids.

Although it’s never explicitly said, I suspect opponents of same-sex marriage also sometimes raise polygamy because it echoes the old myth about homosexual promiscuity.

But for now let’s take the question on face value: does removing marriage discrimination against gay couples open the door to polygamous unions?

Advertisement

My answer is “no”.

In none of the countries which allow same-sex marriage is polygamy officially recognised, even though some of them, like Spain and Holland, have large religious minorities that traditionally allow it.

There is an even wider gulf between the two issues in countries which allow polygamy.

In places like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Nigeria, homosexuals are not only unable to marry, they’re put to death.

This isn’t a coincidence. Same-sex marriage and polygamy are not just different, they are utterly incompatible.

Polygamy, as it’s generally practised, is about a man ruling the lives of several women. It is an arrangement that comes from a time when women were considered less valuable and capable than men, restricted to the house and to childrearing, and made their husband’s property.

This is reflected in the legal status of the wives in polygamous relationships. Generally they lose their rights and autonomy when they marry, are punished much more harshly for adultery, and can be the divorcee but not the divorcer.

Wherever values like this prevail same-sex marriage is inconceivable.

Where all husbands are legally dominant and all wives mere submissive extensions of their mate, it is absurd and profoundly threatening for there to be an official union between two husbands or two wives.

Where marriage is the union of a bread winner who must always be male and a child-carer who must always be female, it is economically unsustainable for people of the same sex to marry.

Same-sex marriage only begins to make sense in a society where there is social and economic equity between men and women and legal equality between marriage partners.

It only becomes possible for two men or two women to marry if men and women are already free to choose how we lead our lives regardless of their gender.

Seen this way, same-sex marriage is about more than love and commitment, as important as these things are.

Unlike polygamy, same-sex marriage is also about equality of the sexes and individual freedom of choice. These are values which represent the best and most precious inheritances in the western tradition and they are values which most Australia hold dear.

Not all change is bad. When it is guided by the values which underpin society it can actually enhance us.

By confirming that Australia is a free and egalitarian society, same- sex marriage will do just that.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rodney Croome is a spokesperson for Equality Tasmania and national advocacy group, just.equal. He who was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 2003 for his LGBTI advocacy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rodney Croome

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy