Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A self-inflicted wound

By Jacob Kirkegaard - posted Tuesday, 15 July 2008


The immigration policy undermines the economic characteristics - entrepreneurial vitality and mastery of new advanced technologies - that make the US the envy of the world. Just like Google, eBay and Yahoo, more than half of engineering and technology companies founded in Silicon Valley from 1995 to 2005 had at least one foreign-born founder, more than a third of US venture capital-backed technology firms report shifting investments and jobs outside the country due to restrictive regulation and America’s largest, most competitive companies cannot get visas for foreign high-skilled workers they want to hire.

Meanwhile, contours of the global battlefield for talent are rapidly changing. The recent proposal for an EU “Blue Card” would allow high-skilled workers from outside the EU to work in multiple EU countries, just one example of a new trend across the OECD. Affected by more rapid population ageing than the US, other OECD countries aggressively work to liberalise their high-skilled immigration laws, while simultaneously tightening regulation of low-skilled and humanitarian-based immigration. Ironically, the other nations frequently copy US policies, particularly those that attract and retain foreign students.

Equally worrisome for the US, the top countries of origin for high-skilled migrants - fast-growing China and India - offer incentives for skilled workers to return home. In 2007, China launched its “green passage” initiative, aimed at luring back tens of thousands of acclaimed overseas Chinese scientists, engineers and executives with promises of guaranteed university places for their children, exemption from household-residence registration - or hokou - requirements and tax benefits.

Advertisement

The US - historically the world’s country of choice for foreign high-skilled workers - has the most to lose from any change in these human-capital flows. While the rest of the rich world has caught up in welcoming high-skilled foreigners, the US could soon struggle to attract global talent.

With the skill-base of the US workforce declining at an accelerating pace relative to the rest of the world, America in the 21st century will need foreign high-skilled workers more than ever. At stake is the ability of the US economy to thrive in the global marketplace.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Reprinted with permission from YaleGlobal Online - www.yaleglobal.yale.edu - (c) 2008 Yale Center for the Study of Globalization.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jacob F. Kirkegaard is a research associate at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and author of “The Accelerating Decline in America’s High-Skilled Workforce: Implications for Immigration Policy.”

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy