Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Close examination of the Health Budget

By Lesley Russell - posted Thursday, 19 June 2008


Even when the costs of child health checks and continuation and expansion of the bowel cancer screening program are included, the Commonwealth’s new commitment to prevention amounts to only $54 million a year over the next four years.

The big loser in the Budget is mental health. Despite the huge burdens of cost and disability that mental illness imposes on society, despite a raft of reports that cogently argue for doing and spending more, and despite election commitments to make mental health a priority, the budget details reveal spending cuts of $290 million in mental health programs over the next four years.

In primary care, the growing concern is that a Medicare system that only pays GPs for services delivered if and when the patient visits their practice will not deliver in terms of better prevention, early intervention and management of chronic illnesses. The incentive payments that were introduced a decade ago to encourage GPs to do more in these areas have not had a huge take-up, and this budget sensibly cuts these incentives - but does nothing about replacing them with incentives that will work.

Advertisement

The rationale provided for these cuts is that the programs have historically been under-spent, and that if demand does increase in the future, then more funds will become available. However there is no commitment to examine the value of these programs, to understand why uptake rates have been less than predicted, and to invest the budget savings in innovative approaches to the delivery of mental health and primary care services.

Changing the focus of the health care system and the way in which services to keep people healthy and treat their illnesses are delivered cannot happen overnight, and needs a cohesive strategy which involves all stakeholders. We should not expect miracles in this first budget in the first six months of government, but we should expect a consistent focus on these new imperatives that will deliver the required new strategies, action plans and funding as soon as possible. The target timeline should be the 2009-10 Budget.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

See www.macroeconomics.com.au for a detailed analysis of the 2008-09 health budget prepared by the Macroeconomics health team.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Lesley Russell is the Menzies Foundation Fellow at the Menzies Centre for Health Policy, which is co-located at The University of Sydney and the Australian National University. She also a senior adviser on health economics, policy and program analysis to Macroeconomics, an economic modeling and consulting business.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Lesley Russell
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy