Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Food rethink

By Karin Geiselhart - posted Wednesday, 18 June 2008


Currently, government planning on climate change takes little notice of food security as a related issue, but awareness is growing. Some councils are working to encourage community gardens, home gardens and composting. All have benefits, particularly in smaller cities and towns, where many homes have a bit of yard. Programs for redistribution of unwanted but edible food are also more common in the United States, where their equity gap is larger than in Australia (although ours is growing).

Benefits of more localised food production and distribution include social interaction, quality assurance, and re-learning simple pleasures. Many older people remember the allotments and gardens of the Depression era or World War II years, often with great fondness.

There is scope for the large industrial supermarkets to soften their approach to locally grown and processed food, and become more niche oriented. Why not stock Suzie’s jam or Nellie’s Nuts? Responsiveness to local offerings could well be part of the “traffic calming” that our whole society needs. Such approaches could also provide a larger employment pool than currently work in the food processing factories we have come to accept.

Advertisement

A return to more individualised production and distribution is in keeping with a search for quality over quantity. The balance may be tweaked in ways that benefit us all. These moves to slower food might not feed the third world, but it could help Australian to move a bit in the direction of becoming the changes we want to see in the world.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Karin Geiselhart has a Phd in electronic democracy and did post-doctoral research on e-business. Formerly a journalist in the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, she has also lectured at the Australian National University in electronic marketing. Currently she is an Al Gore Ambassador for climate change, and involved in green property development and community green entrepreneurial activities.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Karin Geiselhart

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Karin Geiselhart
Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy