Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

An economist’s view of the proposed workplace reforms

By Fred Argy - posted Tuesday, 8 November 2005


The Government could decide to step up wage deregulation and hang the social cost! But such a hard line strategy is not really what most Australians want.

A second alternative would be to step up wage deregulation but link it with compensatory measures such as means-tested family payments and earned income credits for low-paid workers. Such a package might well produce substantial employment gains with more limited social costs. But there are two problems. The compensation would only offset the erosion in relative earnings of low-paid workers. It would still leave vulnerable workers without control of their lives in the workplace. The second problem is that the compensation measures would be costly and require a deferment of tax cuts - which might be politically difficult in the current climate.

There is a third way of achieving good employment outcomes without much social sacrifice: it is to go part of the way down the Scandinavian route. For two decades, a string of Scandinavian and smaller European countries have been successfully using “active labour market” programs (for example retraining, work and mobility incentives, wage subsidies and selective job creation) to deliver comparable unemployment and economic outcomes to the US - but with much lower levels of income inequality and higher levels of social mobility. Unfortunately mainstream Australia is not culturally disposed towards the Scandinavian high-tax egalitarian model (even though it has been economically successful).

Advertisement

Who said policy reform was easy?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Canberra Times on November 4, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

30 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Fred Argy, a former high level policy adviser to several Federal governments, has written extensively on the interaction between social and economic issues. His three most recent papers are Equality of Opportunity in Australia (Australia Institute Discussion Paper no. 85, 2006); Employment Policy and Values (Public Policy volume 1, no. 2, 2006); and Distribution Effects of Labour Deregulation (AGENDA, volume 14, no. 2, 2007). He is currently a Visiting Fellow, ANU.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Fred Argy

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 30 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy