Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Releasing prisoners poses serious risks to the community's health

By Lois Davis - posted Monday, 22 September 2003


As states struggle to make budget ends meet in the current fiscal climate, many are considering the early release of state prisoners as one answer to the problem. When prisoners are released back into communities, some people worry about public safety, concerned primarily about becoming victims of crime. While these concerns are legitimate, another public safety threat is just as real, if not as obvious: the threat to people's health and to the public health system itself.

Research has shown that much disease goes undetected by the correctional health care system. Existing estimates of disease prevalence among the prison population have had to rely on multiple data sources outside of the system because of serious limitations in the data available from state prisons.

Our best estimates indicate that prisoners who are awaiting release tend, on average, to be sicker - in many cases, much sicker - than the population as a whole. This is true across the spectrum of disease categories. When it comes to the prevalence of infectious, or communicable, diseases, prison inmates are 4 times more likely to have active tuberculosis (TB), nine to ten times more likely to have hepatitis C, five times more likely to have AIDS, and eight to nine times more likely to have HIV infection.

Advertisement

Among chronic diseases, the prevalence of asthma is higher in prison inmates. Although the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension are lower than for the population as a whole, they are relatively high given that the prison population is generally younger. These conditions are typically associated with older people. The prison population is growing older, however, which means these prevalences are likely to increase over time.

Inmates also have higher prevalence of mental illness - they are three to five times more likely to have schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders and one and a half to three times more likely to have bipolar disorder - and are more likely to suffer from substance abuse and dependence problems.

What can be done to reduce the potential risks to the health of the communities to which prisoners are returning? What can be done to reduce the potential strain on the public health system itself?

First, state prisons need to improve the data systems they use to track and assess the health status of prisoners. For example, we know little about the prevalence of co-occurring disorders (e.g., mental illness and substance abuse, HIV and hepatitis B or C), both because of inaccurate or missing data and because of variations in screening and discharge planning of soon-to-be-released offenders. This hinders our ability both to understand the true disease burden that prisoners will impose on the communities they are reentering and to decide how to ensure the continuity of their care upon release.

Second, there is a need for improved screening, prevention and treatment programs for state prison inmates.

Third, prisons could improve the discharge and transitional planning for ex-offenders with special health care needs. Such improvements can help protect the public's health, since without them, ex-offenders with unknown and untreated infections - TB, for example - may contribute to the spread of disease in a community and to the development of drug-resistant strains.

Advertisement

Finally, the system will need to address the structural problem of who pays for improved screening and more treatment. Improved screening could be expensive for prison systems, because it is likely to increase the number of inmates identified as requiring treatment services and whose care will need to be transferred to community health care providers upon release. Moreover, improved screening could lead to greater liability for the prison system. For example, screening could demonstrate that some inmates were infected with HIV while incarcerated and therefore might have been subjected to a cruel or unsafe environment.

There are no simple solutions to the problem but the problem is pressing. Ex-offenders rely heavily on the public sector for health care services and will be returning to communities and neighborhoods with limited health care resources at a time when the public health system and America's "safety net" are severely strained. Unless we take actions now, we may be facing a looming health crisis just over the horizon.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

This article was first published in Rand Review Summer 2003 - Vol. 27, No. 2.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Lois Davis is a health policy researcher at RAND.

Related Links
RAND
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy