Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Western liberalism and the challenges of the emerging global order

By Russell Trood - posted Friday, 11 April 2008


Third, questions abound over the extent to which movements animated by fanaticism and extremism, some clothed in coherent ideologies and others not, will shape the new order.

International politics has long been an arena of often intense ideological competition, but in recent years the rise of new fundamentalisms, whether they revolve around tribalism in parts of Africa, theology in the Middle East, politics in the Balkans, or zealotry somewhere else have not only wrought misery, they have destabilised countries as well as international affairs more widely.

The times ahead seem hardly more promising. Perhaps fanaticism can be contained - its destructiveness of prosperity and security limited to the local. But leaving aside the questionable moral aspect of any such strategy, dealing with extremism, militancy and fanaticism in all of its ugly manifestations will be a serious test for the political resourcefulness of the international community.

Advertisement

Fourth, the character of the emerging order will be shaped by the international community’s success in confronting the challenges of environmental sustainability.

Environmental decline has caused the collapse of small communities in the past and others are now at risk, but the scale of the environmental challenge is now global, affecting states and cultures, habitats and ecosystems.

Climate change may be the most visible sign of environmental stress, but the strains on the Earth’s land, air and water resources are widespread and in some places leading to acute insecurities. Many of these environmental challenges will have to be confronted in the decades ahead.

Whether modern science and technology offer the knowledge needed to manage this deteriorating situation is an open question, but this seems less in doubt than the need, still far from hand, for the international community to summon the political energy, will and leadership to develop solutions.

Finally, the character of the new order will be defined partly by the norms and values that predominate within it. Concepts of peace, justice, order, security, prosperity and legality all possess a challenging complexity within the context of international relations, yet all ages tend to be defined by the extent to which values such as these gain legitimacy among members of the international community.

If Western liberalism, for example, has not been the most peaceful of global orders, it has nevertheless been notable for its increased rule-making and expanding institutionalism. This trend could continue if, as some commentators have suggested, we are entering an era of significant normative development in international relations.

Advertisement

Perhaps our age is one that will pay greater attention to more sophisticated ideas of right, obligation and society in international affairs than has been the case in the more recent past. If so, the results will be surely slow to mature. Still, if the new order were to evolve in this way it could well involve some significant changes in the normative foundations of international relations.

The way these key issues play out over the coming decades will determine the future of the Western liberal order. Some of the trends in the international system - the rise of new great powers, for example - will pose acute strategic challenges for great power management and presage an era of considerable instability. The trends overall do not necessarily foreshadow a period of confrontation, or indeed the wider use of military force to resolve disputes. But in periods of insecurity where interests clash and power is shifting among key actors, this cannot be ruled out.

There is reason to hope however, that the rules and institutions which constitute such an important part of the current order will permit many of the coming instabilities to be managed in other ways.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

This article is drawn from Senator Russell Trood's monograph, The emerging global order Australian foreign policy in the 21st century, published recently by the Lowy Institute for International Policy.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

19 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Russell Trood is a Liberal senator for Queensland in the Australian senate and is Deputy Chair of the Senate’s Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Russell Trood

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Russell Trood
Article Tools
Comment 19 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy