Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Hypocrisy over carers

By Peter Martin - posted Thursday, 13 March 2008


Spare me the sob stories. I used to work in television. I know how it’s done. First you find someone in need who is going go “suffer” as a result of a government “decision” - in this case Labor’s apparently heartless move to axe the $1,600 a year carers’ bonus. Then you get that person to describe the genuinely troubling circumstances in which they live, then you get the Opposition to pile on.

Like this:

For God’s sake Mr Rudd, please rule out an attack on Australia’s carers. These are the saints in Australian society. They’re the people that pick up the load when governments and non-government organisations fail.

Advertisement

That’s the Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson.

How about:

I accept that it is important to maintain the fight against inflation. But the idea that carers, who are some of the most vulnerable people in this country, should be front and centre in the fight against inflation is just wrong. And for the government to say ‘we need an even bigger surplus, therefore we are cutting bonuses to carers’ is using carers as human shields in the war against inflation.

That's from the Coalition’s former Minister for Industrial Relations Tony Abbott.

Never mind that the entire premise is wrong and that it is the Opposition (and arguably the media) who have been using carers as human shields ...

The report that broke the story in The Australian last Friday was wrongly headed “Razor gang slices out compassion as carer bonus slashed”. It began: “Labor will scrap annual bonuses of $1600 paid to carers as its budget razor gang carves deep into welfare.”

Advertisement

The razor gang, otherwise known as the Expenditure Review Committee, was never going to slash a carers’ bonus. There wasn’t a carers’ bonus to slash. Not only was it not in the forward estimates - the previous government never budgeted for it continue - it wasn’t even in the budget for the financial year that we are currently in.

How could that be? The previous Treasurer Peter Costello gave the game away when he announced in last May’s budget that, as in the previous three budgets, the bonus would be paid by June 30. That’s right, June 30, 2007 - an odd date for a payment that was announced in the 2007-08 budget.

The purpose of the payment, dare I say it, was not so much to support carers as to find somewhere to stash what looked like being an embarrassingly big surplus for the financial year about to end that would otherwise go into the Future Fund and be unavailable for electoral bribery.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

First published at Peter Martin’s blog on March 11, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Peter Martin is the Economics Editor of The Canberra Times. He also writes about economics for New Matilda and is heard on NightLife on ABC Radio. He is a former Economics Correspondent for Australia's ABC radio and SBS television. His blog is here.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Peter Martin
Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy