Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Sorry, but not sorry enough

By Adam Creighton - posted Friday, 7 March 2008


Oscar Wilde wrote in 1888 “we cannot re-write the whole of history for the purpose of gratifying our moral sense of what should be”. Indeed, scoring easy moral victories over dead people and basking in our own self-righteousness is unflattering, and all the more so when contemporary ills are so pressing and dire. The Left’s Holy Trinity of race, class and gender is particularly noxious as it simplistically encourages inter- and intra-generational victimhood among groups based upon their physical characteristics.

Where are the Sorry Days and apologies for other people damaged and distraught by yesteryear’s perceived policy mistakes? My grandmothers, and thousands of others, lost some of their children from hopelessly lax and lenient drink-driving laws, seemingly as absurd to us today as any passé social program..

What of the Australian government’s complicity in the removal of 10,000-odd British children to Australia in the decades after World War II?

Advertisement

Others too have been scarred by too-slow scientific and social progress. Yet, it seems that those groups who don’t fit neatly into the Holy Trinity are not as highly regarded. In fact, surely by definition any piece of legislation or common law principle that now applies, or one that no longer applies, is evidence of past abuse, and is thus deserving of an “apology”.

To those who say an apology is pragmatic and “heals the nation”, I say elevating particular group grievances in the name of “healing” some “national story” is, frankly, fascism-lite and will ultimately foster a more fractured and fractious society. Moreover, time is in fixed supply and the fuss over historical apologies wastes intellectual and physical effort. Apologise for all history, or none at all.

Let’s apologise for the present, not the past, and provide genuine redress. Far from being hesitant in removing Aborigines from their dysfunctional surrounds, we should implement the wholesale education and integration of Aborigines into modern society, as some Aborigines themselves suggested in 1938.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

This is an extended version of an article which was first published in the American, a magazine of the American Enterprise Institute, on March 4, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

17 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Adam Creighton is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Adam Creighton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 17 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy