Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Getting it right on industrial relations

By Mark Bahnisch - posted Thursday, 13 March 2008


This possibility slipped away under WorkChoices (child care workers were among the last to benefit). It needs to be revived, but revived in an innovative way - assessment of work value could be a major task for the AIRC in the award modernisation process, and the resulting templates could have both legal and exhortatory force for employees outside the award system.

The government needs to work with a number of partners to emphasise equity at work not just as an issue of social justice, but also as an economic imperative. It would be very worthwhile, here, as well, to look at the continuing barriers to full time work in the tax-welfare mix - rather than just proceed with the photocopy of Costello’s tax policy after this year’s budget.

Readers may have noticed I’ve not yet mentioned unions - perhaps a surprising omission in an article on industrial relations and the workplace. But that’s a deliberate omission - from a policy perspective, the government should take a truly neutral stance towards unions in terms of the framework for bargaining.

Advertisement

Unions can be useful social partners, and need to focus their efforts on issues of productivity and equity as well as wage justice. But the legislative framework should provide for genuine freedom of association - and genuinely free collective bargaining (which includes an obligation on all parties to negotiate in good faith).

Unions have been in many ways held back by the twin obstacles of nostalgia for the good old days of closed shops and compulsory arbitration and by a perception that they’re not responsive to their members. Neither of those faults is true of the best unions and the most effective unionists - but unions will achieve most when they take control of their own destiny rather than rely on the state for survival.

It’s probably a tad utopian to expect that workplace regulation will cease to be an arena of major political conflict. But everyone would benefit from a more settled and flexible framework, and a major focus of the new government’s efforts should be getting this right.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Mark Bahnisch is a sociologist and a Fellow of the Centre for Policy Development. He founded the leading public affairs blog, Larvatus Prodeo.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Bahnisch

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy