Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Saying sorry was just the first step

By Patmalar Ambikapathy Thuraisingham - posted Tuesday, 19 February 2008


Until we have a level playing field in services that mainstream Australia enjoys, the plight of many Aboriginals will remain a matter of guilt, shame and regret for us all. How can these breaches of basic human rights escape our consciousness?

Even if they have not been listening in the past, surely Malcolm Turnbull, Brendan Nelson and Tony Abbott have now heard about the clearly spelt out disadvantages experienced by Aboriginals today? If not, we need to ask why are they, and others like them, working so hard to maintain a state of denial which allows them to engage in political charade and hypocrisy.

The Prime Minister suggests that not apologising to the stolen generation is a blot on our soul and this takes the issue into a moral dimension and beyond. Clearly those opposed to an apology do not have an awareness that we are being confronted by an ethical and moral issue and not just a compensation based legal one.

Advertisement

Can we still deny that we took settled land, too often by force without compensation (very few Sitting Bulls here), used our original citizens as cheap labour, fathered children who were half non Aboriginal and then removed them from their homes and land? Is this not an injustice? The removal of children must be seen in the context and against the backdrop of our violent early history and the erosion of legal, economic, social and cultural autonomy, if we are to properly understand its consequences. How is this not a problem for our conscience then and now?

Lawyers like Malcolm Turnbull must surely know that where there has been injustice, the role of the law is to remedy and redress those wrongs.

The first step to redressing injustice against Aboriginal is an apology, but this is just the symbolic first step. Although powerful it is not enough, as we have a long journey to embark on after this to provide relief from past and present wrongs. Compensation is part of that journey and Tasmania has set a precedent all can follow.

This legal acknowledgement can allow the grieving process to commence and provide some resolution so that the retrieval of shattered lives is possible. An apology means that we can no longer engage in the pretence of denying our collective responsibility for the disparate existence of one sector of our society. It is also a powerful healing tool not just for our Aboriginal citizens but for our own guilt and deep regret as well.

Ultimately an apology will engender greater respect and regard for the human rights of all Australians and we will be seen globally as more just, mature and compassionate beings.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

25 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Patmalar Ambikapathy, BA ( Durham) Barrister ( London), M.Phil ( Cambridge), is a Barrister and Human Rights Consultant for Children.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Patmalar Ambikapathy Thuraisingham

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 25 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy