Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Knowing when to say 'sorry'

By Russell Marks - posted Monday, 11 February 2008


Our identities as individuals do not contradict our identities as “Australians”; indeed, they inform one another. The 1992 High Court decision which overturned the “terra nullius” comforter was a first step in this national healing. An apology to the Stolen Generations will be another.

I want to mention the “basic principles on the right to reparation for victims of gross violations of human rights and humanitarian law”, commonly referred to as the “van Boven principles” (after the Dutch jurist Theo van Boven, who was instrumental in their formulation while he was UN Special Rapporteur between 1986 and 1991). These principles, which were specifically invoked by the authors of the BTH report, recognise the obligation of nation-states to ensure respect for human rights and international law, and one irrevocable duty of such is to ensure that “adequate legal or other appropriate remedies are available to any person claiming that his or her rights have been violated”.

The principles are based, at their foundations, on the ideas of National Healing which have also informed the various Truth Commissions in places like South Africa, Sierra Leone, East Timor, Ghana, Chile and, perhaps most relevant to our own history, Canada.

Advertisement

Of course, these obligations are mostly moral and not, under Australian law, binding. But our actions today will determine the future shape of our world - and those actions must be informed by our ideals of that future.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

62 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Russell Marks is a PhD candidate at La Trobe University. His thesis topic is Nationalism, Patriotism and the Australian Left: An Intellectual History.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Russell Marks

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 62 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy