Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Building bridges of spaghetti is not enough

By John Daicopoulos - posted Monday, 4 February 2008


Taking matters go from bad to worse, to make an application to teach in a Queensland state school the submission would have to include the identical documentation (all certified) that was already submitted to the Queensland College of Teachers; a parallel and burdensome ordeal.

After years of professional development often paid for by the school, losing the maturity of experience and leadership qualities of teachers long before retirement makes no sense. Not to mention the devastating loss of mentoring that skilled senior teachers provide for our student teachers and the crumbing foundation behind our university teacher training programs, particularly in physics.

Although teacher renewal is important, there is little incentive for experienced teachers to return (or stay) when the demands inherent in the system require it. This outdated system does little to generate any level of enticement to pick up the chalk once it has been put it down, even on a part time or casual basis. Whether our skills are in demand or not, once out, physics teachers stay out.

Advertisement

Try as it has, the educational bureaucracy has failed and we are not listening. Longstanding calls to teach based on the love of teaching or the inspiring of young minds has proven patently unsuccessful - it is not compelling enough.

If the very calibre of teacher we desire to teach difficult and technical subjects like physics and mathematics is choosing not to teach, then many features of education need to change before they choose otherwise. The compulsion to change ought to rest within the system.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Daicopoulos is the editor of Australian Physics, the Journal for the Australian Institute of Physics and has been a physics teacher in Australia and Canada for 17 years. John has previously been published by Quadrant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Daicopoulos

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy