Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Education Revolution - radical change or chucking a 360?

By John Ridd - posted Friday, 21 December 2007


All the Boards would have to be instructed to rewrite all subject syllabi and assessment systems to meet the triple criteria defined, valid and reliable. They must be instructed to complete the task within six months and the verdict as to whether the syllabi meet the criteria should be delivered by people from outside the Education Establishment, probably professional mathematicians, historians, physicists and so on. If the Boards cannot do the job, then they will have to be dismissed and replaced with people who can.

All the peculiar ideas that have permeated, infected if you like, education, trainee teachers and particularly the Boards emanate from Faculties of Education. They need to face the reality that either their “research” has influenced what happens in schools or it has not. If it has then they are in major part responsible for the mess we, or to be precise our children, are in. If it has not influenced what happens then it is very hard to think of any reason for their continued existence.

Education Unions have nothing like the power that they are generally thought to have. Their influence is almost entirely within the ALP party itself - in other words it is an internal party matter. Both Mr Rudd and Ms Gillard show signs that they are capable, and if necessary willing, to tell them to butt out and to get back to what they should be - an industrial union.

Advertisement

Unless Mr Rudd and Ms Gillard get serious about subject syllabi and assessment systems so that they are all defined, valid and reliable, then we will not, can not have the radical revolution we need. Instead we will have lots of talk, hype and media opportunities, but no change in direction - just chucking 360s.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

17 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Ridd taught and lectured in maths and physics in UK, Nigeria and Queensland. He co-authored a series of maths textbooks and after retirement worked for and was awarded a PhD, the topic being 'participation in rigorous maths and science.'

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Ridd

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Ridd
Article Tools
Comment 17 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy