The UN accepted the results of this farce but the West Papuan people did not. They continue to call for a true act of self determination.
Australian involvement
As to Australia’s involvement - originally we supported the Dutch in trying to hold onto West New Guinea, as we preferred another colonial power to act as a buffer zone between Australia and any potential invader from the north. However, once the US decided to back Indonesia, Australia followed suit. In fact, Australia actively supported the Indonesian takeover.
At a request from Indonesia two West Papuan leaders, Clemens Runawery and Willem Zonggonao, were removed by Australian officials from a plane just weeks before the UN supervised vote (in Australia’s then colony of PNG). They were on their way to the UN in New York carrying testimonies from many West Papuan leaders calling for independence. Because of Australia’s involvement, they never had a chance to plead their case.
Advertisement
Human rights abuses
Since Indonesia took over control of West Papua as many as 100,000 people are believed to have lost their lives in the conflict. Those who have followed the actions of the Indonesian military in East Timor will not be surprised at such a high figure. A report about the activities of the Indonesian military (TNI) in East Timor (released in 2006) documents how the TNI used napalm, chemical weapons and starvation as a weapon against the East Timorese people. Some of the same military that operated in East Timor are now in West Papua.
There are ongoing human rights abuses in West Papua and the situation is deteriorating. There appears to be a systematic campaign by the military and police to intimidate any individual or organisation whom the military and police deem to be separatists. For all the talk about Indonesian being a democracy the TNI itself has not reformed. Numerous reports, including the US State Department's 2005 Human Rights report, support this. The Human Rights report states that "Security forces continued to commit unlawful killings of rebels, suspected rebels, and civilians in areas of separatist activity, where most politically motivated extrajudicial killings also occurred".
Flag raisings
The West Papuan people raise their flag as an act of celebration but also as a protest against the injustices they suffer under Indonesian rule. Except for a small period of openness when President Wahid came to power in October 1999, the Morning Star flag has been banned.
Two of the most famous West Papuan political prisoners are Filep Karma and Yusak Pakage. On December 1, 2004, they were arrested for being part of a rally where the Morning Star flag was raised. In May 2005, a court sentenced Filep Karma to 15 years in prison and Yusak Pakage to 10 years in prison on charges of treason against the state. Amnesty International considers both Filep Karma and Yusak Pakage to be prisoners of conscience who have been detained solely for the peaceful exercise of their right to freedom of expression.
Earlier this year eight West Papuans were arrested (later released) at the end of a four-day Papuan Tribal Congress meeting in Jayapura. Police made the arrests simply because the Morning Star flag was used in the opening ceremony by a group of traditional dancers from Manokwari.
The West Papuan people face great challenges: ongoing human rights abuses; the exploitation of their natural resources with little or no benefit to themselves; the danger of becoming a minority in their own land as the result of migrants arriving daily; and a possible HIV-AIDS epidemic.
Advertisement
We all want to have good relations with our neighbours but good relations with Jakarta should not be at the expense of the West Papuan people who are struggling for their right to self-determination. The majority of the Australian people also believe in the same right. A news poll commissioned by businessman Ian Melrose, showed that 77 per cent of Australians believe that the West Papuan people have a right to self-determination. Hopefully the new government will take the issue of West Papua seriously instead of just hoping it will disappear.
Australian governments of all persuasions have believed that a stabilised region to our north is our best defence. Kevin Rudd gave a talk in July to the Lowy Institute on the very subject called Fresh Ideas for Future Challenges: A New Approach to Australia's Arc of Instability. In discussing Australian-Indonesian relations, however, there was no mention of West Papua. Yet it is the Indonesian military that are one of the main destabilising factors in West Papua. The activities of the military, their involvement in human rights abuses and resource extraction will lead to the very instability the government is trying to avoid.
If ever an issue needed “fresh ideas” it’s West Papua. A good start for the Rudd Government would be not only to raise the abuses being committed by the TNI in West Papua with Jakarta, but to also urge the Indonesian Government to enter into a dialogue with the West Papuan leadership. This is all the West Papuans are asking for: a dialogue to try and solve the many issues of concern in the territory.
We know from history that dialogue is the beginning of the political resolution of such conflicts. To quote from Nelson Mandela, “One of our strongest weapons is dialogue”.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
6 posts so far.