Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Whose education revolution is it?

By Linda Graham - posted Monday, 19 November 2007


Like them or loathe them, education unions have been talking up these issues for a long time, but for some reason they don’t appear to have penetrated.  Perhaps it’s because the unions have been so demonised by the Coalition?

Against this divisive backdrop, an education revolution not yet properly articulated by either political party is absolutely necessary in Australia for several reasons.

Public education in Australia needs a massive investment injection. Our country needs to inoculate itself against the inevitable minerals export slowdown which will leave a gaping hole in our economy and growth prospects.

Advertisement

Without investing now in a universal education system that is responsible for the critical mass of future human capital needed to address potential skills and labour shortages, Australia is at risk of handing our intellectual property rights to others.

It's the 70 per cent of kids in public schools who will, in just 20 years, comprise a considerable chunk of Australia’s active labour force. Their education is fundamentally tied to the future prosperity and moral fortitude of this great but rather backward-looking country.

What kids learn from K-6 in the local public school formulates the foundational tools with which they can attack the increasing complexity of the middle and senior years’ academic curriculum.

If Australia wants knowledge producers, primary school is when we need to lay the foundations. It is at this juncture that governments need to invest in comprehensive and intensive classroom-based support for those having difficulty.

And it’s simplistic to argue that a borrowed policy of school competition, vouchers to subsidise tuition franchises, or a federally funded dual-system that generates massive cost duplications at taxpayer expense is the only solution.

Public schools around the nation already teach children "to read, to write, to spell and to add up". What needs to be said loud and clear is that in the last 11 years, the Coalition government has had little positive impact on their ability to do so.

Advertisement

In education, as in so many other areas of social policy, the Coalition has been waging a war designed to fundamentally restructure Australian society.

John Howard’s mantras, echoed by Education Minister Julie Bishop and her predecessor Brendon Nelson, regarding the scourge of sociologists in education faculties, the perils of postmodernism in English classrooms, the need for a new grand narrative to counteract the apologists black arm-band view of Australian history and the value of values have been peddled for years.  To the fundamental neglect of what happens in the day-to-day of Australian classrooms.

Julie Bishop’s vision for education at all levels has, rightfully, been quality, quality, quality. However, under the guise of choice, the Coalition has been undermining and under-cutting the public system by subsidising private for-profit organisations in the areas of child care, education and learning support - many of whom deliver anything but quality.

The "pro-choice" policy launched by the Coalition party will not drive better school performance. Instead it will further squeeze state governments who have the unenviable job of public service provision. And that is the primary aim.

This Coalition’s education policy is not about giving parents choice. It is two-pronged attack designed to lure as many away from the public system, leaving these institutions to wither on the vine and to claw back funding for what are suddenly poorly attended and underperforming schools.

So, on November 24, Australian voters will have a stark ‘choice’ to make. Wave goodbye to the prosperous futures of 70 per cent of our kids or give everyone a fair go by ensuring that all our kids can access and benefit from the best education system mums and dads shouldn’t have to buy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

27 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Linda Graham completed her doctoral study, Schooling Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders: educational systems of formation and the "disorderly" school child at Queensland University of Technology in 2007. Of particular interest was how schooling practices and discourses may be contributing to the increased diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). While at QUT, she contributed to an international review of curriculum and equity commissioned by the South Australian Department of Education & Community Services and chaired by Allan Luke. Linda is now Senior Research Associate in Child & Youth Studies in the Faculty of Education and Social Work at The University of Sydney.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Linda Graham
Related Links
Further info on Coalition education policy of parent choice and school competition

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Linda Graham
Article Tools
Comment 27 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy