Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Howard, Gunns, political donations: our system is broken

By Mike Bolan - posted Tuesday, 23 October 2007


When we need to act to address novel situations, we often need independent and impartial analysis. What our system actually delivers is more of the same courtesy of a party and campaign donation system that hides donations from scrutiny and allows companies with a particular interest to distort any hope of impartiality with cash payments.

Until and unless we correct this bias, we are likely to be facing a very uncertain future because most decision making will be about priorities that have been effectively purchased through campaign donations.

With this in mind, we might ask how can we expect rational climate change responses when the fossil fuel industry is controlling party coffers, when the logging industry is buying favours through cash donations and when the car industry is keeping governments fixated on the automobile? It’s been argued that the reason we have a single wheat "desk" (Australian Wheat Board) is due to AWB donations to the National party.

Advertisement

Another critical problem is how we can get these distortions changed. It’s pretty obvious that the public would be fighting the major parties all the way to get a change to this system. Party funding is already available from the taxpayer, perhaps that funding could be increased so that we can remove this distorting party donation system from Australia’s methods of governance.

Failure to correct this systemic problem can only mire us further into corrupted decision making, public distrust of government and repeated failures to organise to deal with new classes of threat whenever those threats are spin-offs of existing large business.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Tasmanian Times on 11 October, 2007



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mike Bolan is an independent complex systems and business consultant. Mike worked for the Tamar valley community and others to prepare materials for the RPDC in which he spent about a year visiting Tasmanian communities, businesses and individuals to learn the impacts of forestry operations and the implications of a pulp mill on them. The lessons learned from that period are still relevant today and are used in this story, which is told to inform not to gain income.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mike Bolan

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy