Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is university necessary for all?

By Phil Rennie - posted Thursday, 18 October 2007


I think middle class parents have a lot to answer for. Many of the baby boomer generation never went to university, so to them it is still an elite institution.

Many still believe that the only path to success is through university and that trades are a dirty, low-skilled career choice.

At the same time, many 17- and 18-year-olds don’t really know exactly which course will suit them and they end up just following their friends. University is more like a rite of passage for many middle class kids, just like an OE or getting a tattoo.

Advertisement

But perhaps the biggest cause of the problem is the government. By subsidising 75 per cent of course fees (about $12,000 a year) politicians are making university appear artificially attractive. Interest free loans only add to this problem.

By contrast, if you want to be a builder or a plumber there are only a limited number of apprenticeships and capped funding. It’s little wonder then that so many young people choose university when the government is effectively paying them to do so.

The government is well aware of this problem, and is promising to take more of a hands-on approach to funding courses that are in the national interest. But maybe the answer is not to give up on student choice but to make that choice a little more realistic.

Higher fees might not be popular, but they need to be considered.

Governments have always subsidised university education because of the public benefit it has for society, by making us more civilised and productive (and richer) as a nation. But given the explosion in student numbers and the high cost to society, surely its time to re-evaluate whether the benefit to society really is worth 75 per cent.

Is it really fair that working class families are taxed so middle class families can ensure their children remain in the middle class?

Advertisement

Of course, no politician will have the guts to do this, because students and their parents are such a powerful voting lobby. But the longer this distortion carries on, the worse these problems will get.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the National Business Review, NZ on September 7, 2007 and on the Centre for Independent Studies website.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

24 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Phil Rennie is a policy analyst at The Centre for Independent Studies.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 24 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy