Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. HereÔŅĹs how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Curing an ailing system

By Rob Moodie - posted Monday, 8 October 2007

In late June Kevin Rudd and Nicola Roxon released Labor’s health policy Fresh ideas for Health and Future economy (The Age, June 29, 2007) which focused on preventative health care. It was immediately labelled as a wish list by Tony Abbott.

Well, what should we be wishing for in our health system? Given it’s an election year what should we be demanding from our political leaders to improve our health?

Let’s start with having a health system, not only an illness system - one that actively creates good health from birth and maximises our health to the grave.


It needs to be smart, balanced, fair and simple. Let me explain.


We need to drastically change our systems thinking. Our money and effort is focused on illnesses after they’ve happened. We now need to ask at every step in the chain of illness, how could have this been avoided or prevented? How can, for example, the complications of diabetes be minimised if they occur; if they haven’t occurred then how can they be prevented; and how can the diagnosis of diabetes be prevented in the first place?

Smart systems prevent. We have had some great promotion and prevention successes in Australia - immunisation, tobacco control, road trauma, cancer prevention, reduction of cardiovascular disease to name a few. And they have had great results at very reasonable cost. But we only invest less than 3 per cent of our health budget on organised health promotion and prevention programs.

The Labor policy’s focus on preventive health care seems to be a move in the right direction. For example, it talks of one of the blue chip investments in health - tobacco control. It quotes Susan Hurley’s work showing that a 5 per cent reduction in smoking prevalence will save $1 billion from the Commonwealth coffers over the long term. So will Labor invest $100 million in anti-smoking programs needed to get the 5 per cent decrease, save the $1 billion and save an enormous amount of death and disease?

Early family life and early education have profound effects on our health. Smart systems invest heavily in early childhood development - which is not only in maternal and child health services but in universal child care, kindergartens and public primary education.

Smart also means investing in research and development - the amount invested in health services research (to know what can be improved) is miniscule compared to the budgets of the hospital systems. It means investing into researching the causes and solutions to our epidemics of physical inactivity, poor nutrition and their consequences of diabesity.



This is the art and politics of health. We need both public and private funds to support our health system. Our publicly funded health system needs to be maintained and enhanced - universal cover for treatment, care and prevention services, complemented by targeted programs for those with the poorest health.

Look to the US and we see a system out of kilter, publicly under-funded with the private system driven by voracious pharmaceutical and technology companies. Among comparable countries they have the highest costs of services, it is the least fair and has the poorest outcomes. We need the private system in Australia, but complementary to a supported and valued public system.

If you are ideologically opposed to a public system the best way to make sure it doesn’t work is to under fund it. There has been a sad and entirely preventable rise in poor dental health since the Commonwealth government pulled out its dental health scheme - and of course it has impacted most on the poorest.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article is an edited version of one first published in The Age on July 2, 2007.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rob Moodie is Professor of Global Health at the Nossal Institute for Global Health at the University of Melbourne. Between 1998 and 2007 he was the CEO of VicHealth. He is co-editor of three books, including Hands on Health Promotion. He is currently writing a book called Recipes for a Great Life with Gabriel Gate.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rob Moodie

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Rob Moodie
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy