Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Because of the Privacy Act

By Jonathan Dobinson and Lauren Jamieson - posted Wednesday, 17 October 2007


Telecommunications privacy

Telecommunications privacy is another area considered by the ALRC in the inquiry. Many aspects of privacy in telecommunications are covered by separate legislation, in particular the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth). The ALRC has made several proposals to reform telecommunications privacy laws. For example, the Telecommunications Act is silent on whether a fee can be charged for an unlisted number. While charging for an unlisted number may not breach privacy laws, it reduces an individual’s ability to control the use or disclosure of their personal information. The ALRC proposes, therefore, that the Telecommunications Act be amended to prohibit the charging of a fee for an unlisted number in a public number directory.

Some types of small businesses that are currently exempt from the Privacy Act may regularly deal in large amounts of personal information - particularly Internet service providers and businesses that provide telephone number databases. While the ALRC propose the removal of the small business exemption, unless and until that proposal is implemented, it is the ALRC’s preliminary view that these businesses should be covered by the Privacy Act.

The ALRC is interested in feedback on whether laws that regulate “spam” and calls by telemarketers should be amended to provide further privacy protection. For example, should the Spam Act prohibit the sending of certain commercial Bluetooth and facsimile messages? Should the exemption for political parties, members of parliament and election candidates under the Do Not Call Register Act 2006 be removed?

Advertisement

Complaint handling

The ALRC’s review has identified concerns about the transparency and efficiency of complaint handling under the Privacy Act. In order to increase efficiencies in the handling of complaints by the Privacy Commissioner, the ALRC has proposed that the Commissioner have the power to refer matters to approved external dispute resolution bodies, such as the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman and Banking and Financial Services Ombudsman, where appropriate.

Where to next?

The proposals outlined in Discussion Paper 72 do not represent the ALRC’s final views. They are preliminary views and the ALRC welcomes feedback on whether they are practical and appropriate. If you would like to comment on any issue, you can use the online comment form on our website, send an email (privacy@alrc.gov.au), or a letter.

Feedback on proposals for reform is welcome until December 7, 2007, after which the ALRC will prepare a final report to the Attorney-General. The ALRC’s final report is due to the Attorney-General by March 31, 2008.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Jonathan Dobinson is a Legal Officer working for the Australian Law Reform Commission. He is currently assigned to the ALRC’s Privacy Inquiry.

Lauren Jamieson is a Legal Officer working for the Australian Law Reform Commission. She is currently assigned to the ALRC’s Privacy Inquiry.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy