Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The very model of a (post) modern Prime Minister

By Nicholas Gruen - posted Wednesday, 19 September 2007


Today every week, John Clarke and Bryan Dawe show us how arbitrary is the connection - or otherwise - not just between what our politicians say and do, but indeed between what they say and what they say. Words can mean anything the speaker wants them to mean. The statement “X” might mean “Y”, “X” or “not-X”.

And the audience - dubbed inevitably the “bullshittee” in literature following Frankfurter - is complicit in the code.

As Kevin Drum puts it, it’s “a shared secret that brings them closer together. Thus the piquancy of bullshit, as well as its popularity.”

Advertisement

When John Howard was rearranging his position on when he would retire, he said this to Kerry O’Brien.

I would expect well into my term, … I would probably, certainly form the view well into my term, that it makes sense for me to retire, and in those circumstances, I would expect, although it would be a matter for the Party to determine if Peter would take over.

Remarkably, perhaps out of politeness, or the propriety of easing the Prime Minister through his squirming, Kerry didn’t press him on this new, still inchoate, “form of words”, so different from his earlier “as long as my party wants me” and so similar to previous statements about his expectation of what his expectations might be in the future - subject of course to the wishes of his party.

John Howard, whose detractors like to lampoon him as a man of the 1950s, might be particularly well practiced in such postmodern arts. But he’s never been on his own, either among his peers in politics or among those in the audience - whether they’re in the front stalls as producers, or among the millions down the back as consumers of the medium through which political messages are broadcast.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Nicholas Gruen is CEO of Lateral Economics and Chairman of Peach Refund Mortgage Broker. He is working on a book entitled Reimagining Economic Reform.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Nicholas Gruen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Nicholas Gruen
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy