Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The Dwarf Lords: tiny devices, tiny minds and the new enslavement

By Julian Cribb - posted Tuesday, 4 September 2007


And four centuries or so later, Lord Acton capped it with the observation that absolute power corrupts absolutely.

In the wrong hands - even with benign intentions - these technologies, potentially, afford absolute power to search the lives of individuals and compel their conformity to some centrally-generated conception.

We can be reasonably certain none of the Dwarf Lords will be a statesperson or even an idealist. They will probably enjoy power for its own unalloyed delight.

Advertisement

Under the pretext of “keeping us safe” governments will for the first time in history have the power to watch and control each individual at almost all times.

There is no human life - not even that of Mother Theresa - that could withstand such scrutiny.

XXX

No doubt many will dismiss this as Orwellian fantasy, pointing out that 1984 didn’t come true in 1984 either. However Orwell was not writing about 1984 but rather warning of actual trends under totalitarianism in 1948. Like the Roman satirists under the Emperors he masked his critique by modifying the temporal context in which he placed it. He knew only too well the depths of human turpitude in any age, our own included.

Where Orwell’s scenario differs from mine is that his theme is based on the ultimate crime of betrayal. In the nanocracy there will be no need of traitors. We are all already betrayed by our own recorded words and deeds and associations.

And, like the observer principle in quantum physics where the mere act of observation changes the event being observed, people who know they are, or may be, under surveillance around the clock are bound to modify their natural behavior.

Advertisement

Let me state plainly that I do not advocate a ban or even a moratorium on nanoscience, any more that I would wish to ban physics or chemistry despite the inhuman things that can be done with them.

The problem lies not with the knowledge itself, but with how it is applied.

We have already unlocked Pandora’s nanobox, and the ills are peeping out, as well as the benefits.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All

This article is based on a paper presented at The Governance of Science and Technology, a Joint GovNet/CAPPE/UNESCO Conference on August 9-10, 2007 at the Australian National University.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

32 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Julian Cribb is a science communicator and author of The Coming Famine: the global food crisis and what we can do to avoid it. He is a member of On Line Opinion's Editorial Advisory Board.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Julian Cribb

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Julian Cribb
Article Tools
Comment 32 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy