Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Regulation and innovation: beyond ‘top down’ solutions

By Nicholas Gruen - posted Wednesday, 29 August 2007


Large firms, like governments also face diminishing marginal returns to central planning or “top down” management. The good ones decentralise decision making.

At a time when Anglo-American managers were putting more and more effort into minutely specifying what they required from their employees on the line, their suppliers, including Japanese firms like Toyota, realised massive productivity gains by engaging their customers, employees and suppliers in an endless circle of responsiveness and continuous improvement.

Employees’ enthusiasm for improving they way they worked was assiduously cultivated even to the point of giving them real power - for instance to stop production to fix a problem.

Advertisement

With regulation, our response to the diminishing returns to “top down” management has not been to try to energise and empower those at the “coal face” to continually improve their own performance: it’s been more “top down” management.

All Australian governments have introduced “regulation review” regimes that require any new regulation to run the gauntlet of a “regulatory impact statement” (RIS).

The idea, laudable enough, is to impose a rigorous cost-benefit quality hurdle on all regulation. The practice has invariably fallen short - often scandalously so. The ALP government introduced the policy in 1986. Ten years later formal compliance was derisory. Three out of every four RISs required by the policy were completely ignored, and only one in ten were fully compliant with the policy.

Another decade on, formal compliance is much better, but RISs are regarded cynically - as boxes to be ticked.

While a major inquiry was being held into the problem, WorkChoices passed through Parliament with an RIS that read more like a corporate brochure than an economic analysis.

But even when it’s not traduced in this way, regulating the regulators with RISs seems to have done little if anything to stem the tide of red tape. You’ve heard of Moore’s Law in computing - effectively that computer power doubles each 18 months. Well here’s the “Law of More” in regulation - the number of pages of legislation doubles every decade - and so far this decade we’re a little ahead of schedule!

Advertisement

Where it cannot be swept away with the stroke of a pen - à la tariffs, and shopping hours, and airlines - regulating well is no easy problem.

Regulatory systems will always be commands from the “top down”. But regulation should take a leaf out of businesses’ book. In addition to the thankless and so far largely unsuccessful task of confining new regulation to cost-efficiency, we should pay much more attention to the responsiveness of existing regulation.

We need to give those who are regulated powers to challenge regulation and to propose better ways of achieving regulatory objectives, just like we give workers the ability - by giving them the power - to improve workflow on the line.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Nicholas Gruen is CEO of Lateral Economics which authored the report released yesterday, Beyond Taylorism: Regulating for Innovation: a discussion paper commissioned for the Victorian Government’s National Innovation Agenda. First published in the Australian Financial Review on August 28, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Nicholas Gruen is CEO of Lateral Economics and Chairman of Peach Refund Mortgage Broker. He is working on a book entitled Reimagining Economic Reform.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Nicholas Gruen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Nicholas Gruen
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy