Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Dealing with a national tragedy - failure is not an option

By Tom Calma - posted Monday, 3 September 2007


It is also concerning that the legislation does not say that decision-makers exercise their discretion consistent with the purported purpose of improving Indigenous wellbeing.

These concerns emphasise the urgent need for an extensive consultation process and a culturally-appropriate public information campaign so that the communities affected by these laws understand what is being done and why it is being done; so they have the opportunity to take some level of “ownership” of the solutions in their own communities. In addition to this consultation, the government needs to listen - really listen - to community views.

If these measures are introduced before communities understand them and without extensive consultation, the processes just become another cause for concern, fear and distrust and they are going to have a counterproductive effect.

Advertisement

Considering the complexity of the legislation and the haste with which it has been enacted, it is highly likely that there will be areas where the measures taken have unintended negative consequences. As such, it is crucially important that there be immediate monitoring and periodic, independent review - via a process which receives and considers public submissions.

There is also a need to put benchmarks in place and establish baseline data now, otherwise we have no means of measuring the progress, or knowing what elements are working to the benefit of Indigenous communities, and what elements should be changed.

At the end of the day, the effects of these measures, and whether they are beneficial or not, will all depend on how they are administered, and whether they are delivered in ways that respect the wishes and aspirations of the relevant communities.

It is peoples’ lives, communities and the oldest surviving continuous culture in the world that politicians are tinkering with here - failure is not an option.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This piece forms part of a chapter in a forthcoming book Coercive Reconciliation: Stabilise, Normalise, Exit Aboriginal Australia edited by Jon Altman and Melinda Hinkson and to be published by Arena Publications next month.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

30 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mr Tom Calma is the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner and acting Race Discrimination Commissioner.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tom Calma

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tom Calma
Article Tools
Comment 30 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy