Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Canning federalism - the Liberals' legacy?

By Klaas Woldring - posted Monday, 3 September 2007


That means that those who seriously support such changes will need to look towards the potentially powerful Senate for change because at least it is possible for voters to vote for people other than the major party candidates in the Senate and have some success. The major parties instruct their voters to vote for them in the Senate as well, but there is no real need for voters to follow these instructions; however, in the past most major party voters do follow these instructions and so there exists a nexus between their two votes. This nexus will need to be broken by voters - they need to de-couple their two votes - and vote for parties or Independents who desire system change.

Only when such candidates are successful in gaining seats in the Senate is it conceivable that major parties may yield to pressures for system change - in return for support for their own policy programs. If major party voters do not de-couple their votes we end up with a "Rubberstamp Senate", such as we have now, and the entire purpose of the Senate is thereby destroyed given the rigid nature of the major party systems.

The only other alternative is that the ALP changes its mind on federalism. That is not what the ALP is talking about right now though. Their defensive counter to Mr Howard's brazen opportunism, amazingly, is to "improve federalism", a stronger COAG role, but not drastic surgery. We have heard all this before. It is a non-solution.

Advertisement

Mr Rudd fears to frighten the horses by bold initiatives on system change. Yet there is growing popular support for this kind of reform. The people want transparency, simplicity, clear accountability, meaningful decentralisation, more funding for local government and a stop to the endless blame shifting that is part of the increasingly useless two-party tyranny.

If the ALP is elected federally there is an exceptional opportunity to restructure Australia. One would think that is where the ALP wants to move the public debate, soon. Thus far there is no sign of it.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Klaas Woldring is a former Associate Professor of Southern Cross University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Klaas Woldring

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Klaas Woldring
Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy