Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Mitigating greenhouse gases

By Stephen Livesley - posted Wednesday, 22 August 2007


Second, recent field measurements have shown that nitrous oxide emissions from legume-grass pastures can be an order of magnitude greater than from the same land under a pine or eucalypt plantation. This greenhouse gas benefit could reduce emissions by a further 1,100kg CO2e per hectare per year. In the same study, it was shown that methane uptake was approximately doubled after planting trees on previously grazed pasture, which removed an additional 5-10kg CO2e per hectare per year from the atmosphere.

These soil-based greenhouse gas benefits are brought about by a reduction in nitrogen additions (from legumes, excreta and urine), improved nutrient cycling and a drier, less compacted soil profile. All in all, planting trees on legume-grass pastures could lead to a greenhouse gas benefit of more than 3.3 ton CO2e per hectare per year, and a third of this comes from soil processes.

The magnitude of these soil-based benefits depends greatly upon the quality and productivity of the previous pasture. A poor quality pasture will have produced little nitrous oxide, therefore the greenhouse gas benefit of converting it to trees will be less than that for a highly productive, legume-grass pasture.

Advertisement

Such benefits should be considered alongside the carbon sequestration benefits of actively growing plantations, which could be as much as 20.0 ton CO2e per hectare per year in tree biomass alone. Reduced methane and nitrous oxide emissions and increased methane uptake following the conversion of pasture to tree plantations could therefore contribute something like another 12 per cent to carbon sequestration benefit of planting trees.

Accounting for greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide will not increase the benefit of natural forest systems, but then again their benefit is obvious and strong enough already, as they provide the greatest biological stores of carbon on the planet, and a multitude of biodiversity, amenity and water quality services. Whereas, accounting for nitrous oxide and methane when planting new forests on agricultural or pastoral land can greatly enhance the greenhouse benefits, beyond those from carbon sequestration alone.

This may sound like a platform for singing the praises of planting trees or the plantation industry itself, but it is not. It is simply an attempt to inject some science into the debate on the greenhouse gas benefits of various land-based industries and other natural ecosystems, whilst bringing attention to the potential benefits (or not) of considering nitrous oxide and methane, that until recently have been largely ignored by policy, industry and researchers alike.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Livesley is a Research Fellow in the School of Forest and Ecosystem Science at the University of Melbourne.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy