Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Jumping at shadows

By John Tomlinson - posted Tuesday, 17 July 2007

Dr Mohammed Haneef was detained for questioning under Australia’s terrorism legislation following his second cousins being implicated in an attack on Glasgow’s Airport terminal building and failed car bomb attack in England.

An old mobile phone SIM card, Dr Haneef had owned, was allegedly found in the Jeep that was used in the failed attack on Glasgow airport.

Initially I, like many others, assumed that Dr Haneef would be questioned for a maximum of 24 hours in a seven-day period and either charged with a serious offence or released. This was before Ruddock, Downer and Howard got into the act.


Alexander Downer was keen to suggest that Australia’s terrorism legislation was working because they had managed to hold Dr Haneef for questioning. Philip Ruddock kept reiterating that Dr Haneef had purchased a one-way ticket from Australia and that police had seized 30,000 pages of documents and computer files and that - amazingly - many of these documents weren’t in English. It is worth remembering that Dr Haneef was born in India. John Howard claimed the terrorism legislation was working and he stood by every word in the legislation, because he had proposed it and if it was shown not to be strong enough then the legislation would be strengthened.

If the police come to my house they will find well over 30,000 pages of documents in my study, they will find an equivalent amount in my bedroom, my lounge room is stacked with even more documents, the laundry cupboards are groaning under the weight of documents, the garage is overflowing with documents (all of which I hope to sort out one day) and then there is my computer with its overburdened hard drive. Some of these documents are in French, Spanish or Tetum.

When I returned from East Timor in late 2005 I gave my Timor Telecom SIM card to a mate in Darwin because I knew there was about $25 still left on it and that he or one of his contacts among the Northern Territory’s East Timor community would be able to use it when they returned to East Timor. Since that time East Timor has been ravaged with internecine violence with over 100 people killed. I have no idea if my SIM card is still circulating.

Eleven days after being detained for questioning Dr Mohammed Haneef was charged with recklessly supporting a terrorism organisation. The facts of the case are that in July 2006 he gave his British Telecom SIM card to one of his relatives when he left England for Australia because it still had some phone credit on it.

What is the Australian public being asked to believe in relation to this case? That those who stacked explosives into cars in London and drove a burning car into the terminal building at Edinburgh Airport would have desisted from these acts of terrorism if Dr Mohammed Haneef had not given them his old SIM card in 2006?

Fourteen days after being detained for questioning, Dr Mohammed Haneef was granted bail on a surety of $10,000 and on condition that he reports three times a week to police and stays away from international departure points. He had already surrendered his passport.


The Crown prosecutor opposed bail arguing that bail should only be granted in terrorism cases in “exceptional circumstances”. The magistrate gave eight grounds for granting Dr Haneef bail including the fact that the prosecution had not provided evidence of a direct link between Dr Haneef and a terrorist organisation. The magistrate found that there was no evidence that the SIM card had been used in a terrorist attack.

What are we left with:

  • Janet is still standing by her man;
  • John is standing by his legislation; and
  • George Bush is still trying to understand how US oil got under Iraqi sand.
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

82 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr John Tomlison is a visiting scholar at QUT.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Tomlinson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Tomlinson
Article Tools
Comment 82 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy