Putnam, in his book Making Democracy Work (1993), analysed a number of regional governments in northern Italy. His conclusion was that those regions where people were heavily involved in community groups and sporting clubs had a better chance of having effective, democratic governments.
As noted by de Tocqueville, in Democracy and America, one of the defining characteristics of early American democracy was the widespread prevalence of intermediate associations. These voluntary associations acted as a buffer and a conduit between the individual and the state.
Putnam's thesis, outlined in his book Bowling Alone, is that in America there has been a significant decline in social capital over the past 30 years. By looking at such indicators as membership of community groups, sporting clubs, school parents and friends associations, Putnam shows that there has been a significant decline in the percentage of the population involved in such pursuits.
Advertisement
Both Putnam and Fukuyama go one step further and argue that this serious decline in social capital is having an adverse effect on America's civil society. Fukuyama refers to high rates of crime and juvenile delinquency as a result of the lack of trust associated with social capital. Putnam also refers to a lack of trust and argues that young people, in particular, are adversely affected.
The argument is that in a complex, abstract society individuals are increasingly experiencing a sense of hopelessness and alienation. As societies become "global" - because of the impact of information-related technologies, new forms of entertainment media, international financial markets and the global economy - individuals search for a sense of the local and the particular.
Meaning, in a more lasting human sense, cannot be delivered by the market. What people want is a sense of communal belonging and a sense that they are valued as individuals who can contribute to the common good.
Within the Australian context the concept of social capital has also gained increasing currency. The journal of the Sydney-based Centre for Independent Studies, Policy, and the journal of the Melbourne based Institute for Public Affairs, IPA Review, have both published articles on the topic.
Vern Hughes argues that, unlike America with its strong history of intermediate voluntary associations, the modern Australian state is based on a belief in state paternalism. Since Federation, Australians have expected strong centralised government; the expectation being that what the individual cannot achieve, the state should supply. While there has been some evidence of voluntary associations in Australia, Hughes, similar to Putnam and Fukuyama, argues that over the last 30 years the supply of social capital has been gradually eroded.
Hughes concludes his article by arguing that "Australia must seek to reconstitute civil society with a rich and diverse associational life". Central to this is the need for individuals, community groups and government to introduce a range of structures based on the concepts of social capital and civil society.
Advertisement
As outlined in Mark Latham's essay in the CIS publication, ways to bolster social capital are difficult to find. Contrary to the arguments normally accepted by the old guard of the Labor Party, the Federal member for Werriwa argues that governments cannot enforce social capital.
Top-down models associated with state paternalism, where attempts to remedy complex and sensitive social issues are based on the assumption that more money and increased government interference provide the solutions, do not work.
That statism does not provide the answer explains Latham's argument that the left's commitment to government intervention is misdirected and ineffective. In areas like welfare increased government assistance promotes a dependency mentality where individuals and communities lose the ability to take control of their own lives. One only needs to read Noel Pearson's views about why Aboriginal communities are disintegrating to see the force of Latham's argument.
The Treasurer has proven himself a very adept and successful manager of the Australian economy. By recognising that "man does not live by bread alone", he has also demonstrated a canny ability to highlight contradictions in the left's perspective and to redefine social debate to better suit a conservative agenda.