Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Prediction markets

By Andrew Leigh and Justin Wolfers - posted Monday, 16 July 2007


Platforms such as NewsFutures, the Hollywood Stock Exchange, and the Foresight Exchange operate using play money, albeit play money that can sometimes be converted into prizes. Thus these platforms evade anti-gambling legislation by operating as games of skill.

The consulting firms running corporate prediction markets have taken the same approach as experimental economists on campuses: they have subsidised participation, allowing everyone to leave a winner, albeit to varying degrees.

Finally, two markets that we are aware of, Economic Derivatives and Hedgestreet, have obtained regulatory approval to offer trading of innovative futures contracts. Hedgestreet started in 2004, and Economic Derivatives, a joint venture by Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs that runs markets in economic numbers, has been operating since 2002.

Advertisement

In Australia, the legal environment has prevented prediction markets from establishing themselves in most states. In addition, there is a concern that for major bookmakers such as Centrebet, trading on economic derivatives would bring them into conflict with the Australian Stock Exchange and the Australian Futures Exchange.

Since Australian betting agencies already handle significant sums of money for elections and major sporting events, relaxation of the regulation governing such markets would bring little risk, but a significant public benefit.

Future applications

Prediction markets are extremely useful for estimating the market’s expectation of the probability of a particular event occurring. Markets on election outcomes serve a useful public purpose in providing an up to the minute barometer of the probability that a given party or candidate will be elected. For firms whose business is exposed to a large degree of political risk, our advice is to follow the betting markets, not the opinion polls or the televised talking heads.

Prediction markets doubtless have their limitations, but they may be useful as a supplement to the other relatively primitive mechanisms for predicting the future like opinion surveys, politically-appointed panels of experts, hiring consultants, or holding committee meetings.

With the exception of a short-lived attempt by a United States defence agency to create information markets, governments have shied away from directly operating them. This may be a sensible policy stance - yet politicians should also recognise that if the valuable information generated by trade in these markets is not fully internalised into the profits earned by these private firms, prediction markets will be underprovided. In the area of economic derivatives, it might well be in the interests of government departments to fund the creation of markets that aggregate traders' expectations of future economic releases.

Indeed, the Reserve Bank of Australia already closely tracks the difference in yields on inflation-indexed bonds and non-indexed bonds - effectively a prediction market on future inflation.

Advertisement

More generally, the highly restrictive stance that governments have taken towards regulating prediction markets does not appear to take any account of the informational benefits of such markets. Would there be a public benefit from liberalising gambling regulations to give prediction markets a freer hand? You bet.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

This is an edited version of an article that first appeared in the Melbourne Review.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Andrew Leigh is the member for Fraser (ACT). Prior to his election in 2010, he was a professor in the Research School of Economics at the Australian National University, and has previously worked as associate to Justice Michael Kirby of the High Court of Australia, a lawyer for Clifford Chance (London), and a researcher for the Progressive Policy Institute (Washington DC). He holds a PhD from Harvard University and has published three books and over 50 journal articles. His books include Disconnected (2010), Battlers and Billionaires (2013) and The Economics of Just About Everything (2014).

Dr Justin Wolfers is an Assistant Professor of Economics at Business and Public Policy Department of the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Andrew Leigh
All articles by Justin Wolfers

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Andrew LeighAndrew LeighPhoto of Justin WolfersJustin Wolfers
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy