Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Australia's detention of asylum seeker children amounts to torture

By Barbara Rogalla - posted Wednesday, 6 August 2003


The incarceration of children under the policy of mandatory detention satisfies all four conditions.

1. Severe pain or suffering

During the Northern Ireland case, the European Court of Human Rights established that inhuman and degrading treatment becomes torture when suffering is intense. This intensity relates to how pain and suffering is experienced by the victim, and depends on personal factors, such as age, sex, state of health and resilience. Children, because of their age and developmental needs, are especially vulnerable.

Advertisement

Children who have suffered or witnessed the pain and suffering of others, are likely to reach torture threshold very quickly within the prison environment of the immigration detention centres. It is therefore crucial that children from refugee populations are not exposed to the harsh realities of mandatory detention.

Even an "innocent" decision, such as room allocation, can have a detrimental effect. A 15-year-old felt terrorised when he was housed with men from the ethnic group that had persecuted him and his family in his homeland. Routine awakening by guards during random night patrols, the use of flashlight beams and the repeating of detainee names can lead to children developing fears about sleeping. One child resisted being put to bed, only to wake later exhausted, screaming with nightmares. Waking detainees and shining a torch in their faces during hourly watch rounds possibly contributes to security. But systematic sleep deprivation is also a widely recognised form of torture.

2. Intentionally inflicted for the purpose of obtaining information/confession or to punish or intimidate "him" or a third person

If children are knowingly placed into conditions of neglect, the damage that inevitably follows is foreseeable. Criminal law stipulates that the knowledge that an act will lead to an outcome equates to intention to create that outcome. Knowing the predictable outcome of the policy of mandatory detention, and nevertheless persisting with it, makes the Australian government culpable of torture of children.

The government has made it clear that, apart from protecting Australia's borders, the policy of mandatory detention is also intended to deter people smugglers from bringing asylum seekers to Australia. Children are incarcerated for the purpose of influencing the actions of "third persons", the people smugglers. Implementation of the Pacific Solution also prevents people from claiming refugee entitlements in Australia, and can be considered a punishment.

3) Consent or acquiescence of a public official or person acting in an official capacity

Advertisement

Torture comes about by the continued refusal of the government to stop the neglect. Government involvement is systematic, because immigration policy precludes any legal means of allowing child refugee applicants without a visa to live in an environment that fosters normal growth and development.

Detained children are not actively mistreated on specific orders from the Australian government. There is no official torturer in the traditional sense: a person who beats a screaming child. But where children are concerned, passive withholding of developmental requirements causes as much damage as active violence. Neglect by policy is just as cruel, unjust, and inhumane as if there were a personal perpetrator. Therefore, the definition of torture needs to be interpreted in a way that challenges mechanistic, systematic, and impersonal neglect. Perfecting torture by a method that dispenses with the necessity of personal interaction during the torture process must not be rewarded.

The Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (DIMIA), has responsibility for Immigration Detention Centres, despite a contract with Australasian Correctional Management that indemnifies the government from damages incurred as the result of day-to-day operation of detention services. Ultimately, the duty of care for safety and security of detained asylum seekers rests with DIMIA and cannot be delegated to a private operator. This is a position that DIMIA accepts. Personnel of Australasian Correctional Management, therefore, act in the capacity of "public officials", as they are operating under the non-delegable duty of DIMIA. The same may be said of detention centres at Nauru and Manus Island, who are also there by order of the Australian Government.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Article edited by Merrindahl Andrew.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This is an edited version of an article first published in the online Journal of South Pacific Law. Click here for the full text.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Barbara Rogalla is a postgraduate student at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia. She worked as a Registered Nurse at the Woomera Immigration Detention Centre and initiated media interest by alleging that Woomera management of Australasian Correctional Management suppressed an investigation into allegations of child sexual abuse at that centre. A parliamentary inquiry later confirmed a cover-up by the company.

Related Links
Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
Department of Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
RMIT University
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy