Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Desperately seeking security

By Gila Svirsky - posted Thursday, 31 May 2007

In Israel, the concept of "security" is a powerful one. It is used to justify all military activity, including the occupation of Palestinian territories and the vast budgets applied to it.

Indeed, a mystique has developed around security: "national security" is a phrase invoked not just to increase military budgets, but also to silence criticism and prevent transparency.

Recent efforts to prevent the publication of testimony about the Second Lebanon War were pursued on the grounds of "security". "Security risks" can be used as a rationale to prevent defendants from seeing the evidence against them in court. Only the highest officials are privy to full information about security related matters, and they prevent this information from seeing the light of public scrutiny and debate.


And because of the role of men in the security establishment - making all the major military and political decisions - men and their views are valued and privileged over women and their views, deepening inequality. Much more could (and should) be said about all this.

Security, however, once meant something much broader than its military definition. Sometimes it's hard to remember that older use of "security", but efforts to revive it have been made in recent years. It is called "human security" and includes areas of activity such as:

  • economic security (having a job, a roof over one's head, access to health care);
  • personal security (safety from gender-related violence, protection from crime, having one's children safe from drugs); and
  • environmental security (knowing that one's tap water is clean and pure, having access to clean beaches, having clean air to breathe).

For several generations, however, neither the Palestinians nor the Israelis have had security, not in its narrow nor in its broader sense. Both societies have lived in an ongoing state of fear and insecurity for many years. And although Palestinians have paid a higher price than Israelis for this conflict, it is quite clear that Israelis also live in a perpetual state of fear and insecurity.

Yet if you talk to Israelis about the occupation, many will tell you that Israel cannot leave the occupied territories because of "security". Security, they will say, is best served by remaining in the West Bank and the Golan Heights, constructing a huge "security fence", and laying siege to the Gaza Strip. Oddly, few Israelis stop to think if these military measures are providing the long-sought security or in fact have been counterproductive, only deepening the fear and insecurity.

The women's peace movement in Israel has begun to work on this problem. We call it a campaign to "reframe security" - to broaden our conception of it. We seek to demonstrate to Israelis that security is not the end-result of having a strong, aggressive army, but rather the product of a broad range of activity, which includes living in a society that cares for its poor, reduces violence, protects its natural resources, and co-exists in peace with its neighbors. Indeed, this campaign seeks to instill the understanding that "peace is the best way to promote security".


As part of this campaign, we take Israelis on "reality tours" to show them the Separation Wall. We bring them into the homes of Palestinians, who are cut off from their land, jobs, and schools by the Wall, and we give Palestinians an opportunity to tell about their lives and how the Wall has changed them.

For most Israelis, this is the very first time they have ever spoken to a Palestinian. We bring the Israelis to checkpoints, and have them observe the soldiers' treatment of Palestinians trying to cross. We also take them to see parts of Israel that have been neglected by the political leaders - the slums, the shelters for battered women, the untreated garbage, the trafficking in women, the inadequate health care centres, the poorly equipped schools.

Each participant goes on a number of tours to see several aspects of the problem. We help Israelis draw the connection between a society that is pouring its resources into occupation and settlements, and failing to address the social problems that exist within it.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Gila Svirsky is a veteran peace and human rights activist, and currently chair of B'Tselem: The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories. She was co-founder of the Coalition of Women for Peace and is an ongoing member of Women in Black. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews).

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy