Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Dobbers: heroes or community wreckers?

By Mirko Bagaric - posted Tuesday, 15 May 2007


To dob or not to dob? That’s the question weighing on the minds of many Australians as they observe some of their neighbours shamelessly flaunt tough water restrictions to preserve their lawns and gardens.

Many people are taking the “I don’t want to get involved approach” in order to not risk disrupting neighbourhood harmony. But equally prevalent are rule worshippers who speed-dial the 000 operator the moment a neighbour’s lawn gets a tinge of green.

The situation is complicated by the fact that there is NO legal duty to report even the most heinous crimes, let alone the odd watery indulgence. Nor can dobbing be justified on the grounds that not to dob is to condone the illegality. Usually there is a world of difference between breaking the law and not reporting a breach of the law. That’s why we are not fined for failing to report people who zoom past us on the highways.

Advertisement

Thus the dobbing dilemma isn’t as simple as that rule violators deserve to be punished. They often do, but that doesn’t mean anyone has a responsibility to dob them in. That’s a personal choice.

There is no clear framework to guide us through the dobbing dilemma. Yet, ethics can lead us in the right direction.

The bad news for dobbers is that their lack of commitment to the task makes us question their real motivation. The police switchboard rarely lights up as a result of motorists who park illegally or pedestrians who run the traffic gauntlet and cross against the lights. Even the most fanatical of rule worshippers normally let such acts slide under their radar.

However, they normally can’t resist calling the dob-in line in relation to acts that potentially inconvenience them. What so irks many water dobbers is that their neighbour’s over-indulgence could lead to their own water supply dwindling down the track. Thus dobbing is often motivated by self-interest, rather than having anything to do with a wider sense of moral or civic duty.

Still, the motivation behind an act is rarely decisive of its moral status. In the end consequences matter most and there is little doubt that rule-obsessed neighbours promote greater observance of the law.

Empirical studies have demonstrated that the greatest deterrent to crime is not the size of the penalty but the perceived risk of detection if a law is broken. Watchful neighbours are, in effect, a civilian police force and assist in reducing the frequency of breaches of the law.

Advertisement

Even if they are doing it for themselves, there is no doubt that it is a good thing that more and more people are observing water restrictions and keeping the reservoir levels in their functional range.

Yet, not dobbing also has its upside. It is a concession to human frailty and contribution to community spirit.

Human relationships function most efficiently and effectively in situations of trust and acceptance. This requires a degree of understanding and behavioural latitude.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

A version of this was in The Age on May 8, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mirko Bagaric, BA LLB(Hons) LLM PhD (Monash), is a Croatian born Australian based author and lawyer who writes on law and moral and political philosophy. He is the author of 20 books and over 100 refereed scholarly articles. He is not connected with any political party or other interest group. He is the author of Australian Human Rights Law (forthcoming). Mirko is the author of Being Happy and Dealing with Moral Dilemmas.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mirko Bagaric

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Mirko Bagaric
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy