Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Immigrants: the market needs them

By Lucy Young - posted Monday, 14 May 2007


A policy of “open borders” raises fundamental questions about political representation, the provision of social services and the maintenance of employee’s rights, none of which were adequately dealt with by Legrain. In arraigning racism and xenophobia as the imagined targets of his proselytising, he rhetorically side-steps even more fundamental issues. It is the act of a neo-liberal adopting the pretence of left-cultural progressivism in order to advance an ideologically ambiguous agenda.

During the lecture, Legrain seemed unwilling to engage with opposing ideas and resentful of the implication that he was not a champion of liberal values. He was defensive when confronted with questions about the impact of increased migration on the environment or the challenges posed by including people of different cultures in the community. He answered that these were “political” issues not “immigration” issues, and the latter was not to blame for either.

Similarly, in response to a question about the Paris riots, Legrain responded that these were not riots about race, but riots about poverty and social exclusion. Even if he was correct and some of the rioters were white French nationals, the idea that considerations of ethnicity, class and social exclusion should be isolated from each other is not convincing. In the real world, policy problems do not observe the neat compartmentalisation on which Legrain seems to insist.

Advertisement

Legrain argues that Canada is a model nation due to its acceptance of high numbers of migrants and the strong adherence of both immigrants and residents to liberal values, including tolerance and the rule of law. He suggests that other developing nations should stop clinging desperately to old-fashioned notions of a distinctive national identity and embrace the Canadian model.

Putting to one side a troublingly un-complicated view of Canadian political history, Legrain does not consider the significance of controlling borders for constructions of national identity. Policing borders is possibly the strongest assertion of national identity that remains available to a modern nation. The control of migration is the final (symbolic) bulwark of the state against globalisation.

Canada does welcome large numbers of migrants from developing countries, but selection is a complex bureaucratic process relying on criteria that reveal the kind of person upon whom the nation is willing to bestow the rights and privileges of residency or citizenship. There is little incentive for the Canadian government to abandon its immigration programs because surrendering control does little to enhance legitimacy and removes a vital mechanism for shaping Canadian society.

Legrain concedes that “nation states still matter”, but leaves the reader with no doubt that he believes globalisation will continue until borders are completely porous and communities thoroughly diverse. To resist the breakdown of national borders is futile, so why not accommodate the movement of people that accompanies it?

The reason is that free market globalisation may be inevitable, but that does not make it desirable. Legrain gives up on persuading his audience to his way of thinking, and settles for making shrill and insistent pronouncements about the end of the geopolitical world as we know it. Fortunately, we don’t have to leave it to the market to determine the most efficient and compassionate immigration program for Australia. We may benefit from asking some of Legrain’s questions, but we can discard his simplistic answers.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The New Critic, Issue 5, May 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

22 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Lucy Young is an articled clerk. She enjoys snorkelling and reading about politics.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 22 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy