Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Truth in advertising: a right for women?

By Leslie Cannold - posted Tuesday, 8 May 2007


Yet the situation remains urgent. Today, the Federal government launched its "pregnancy support" telephone line as part of its $51 million suite of interventions to reduce what the Federal Health Minister Tony Abbott calls the “national disgrace” of Australia’s abortion rate.

The “Helpline” continues to inspire concern among Federal women Senators. Senator Stott Despoja, for instance, has recently worried that the telephone line would not provide relevant or specific information or helpful referrals. Because it will be a free service, anxiety about the truthfulness of the ads run to notify the public of its existence are also a concern.

A new campaign, jointly sponsored by GetUp and Reproductive Choice Australia, will urge Australians to support the passage of the cross-party truth in advertising Bill. Last year 20,000 citizens signed a petition supporting honest advertising of pregnancy counselling services. The current campaign aims to inform Australians that if they want another RU486-type victory - an empowering piece of legislation by women, for women - they need to make their support for the right of all Australians to truthful advertising clear.

Advertisement

Will a pro-transparency groundswell of public support be enough? I think yes. While well-funded and organised, supporters of deceptive and misleading advertising are few in number. I feel confident that the majority of decent Australians - once they realise that existing consumer protection legislation leaves a vulnerable group of women out in the cold - will act to ensure their elected representatives know that they strongly support change.

Regardless of their personal view of abortion, most Australians understand that truth in advertising is the basis of informed consent and individual choice, and that these principles - core to our liberal pluralist democracy - must not be traded away.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article first ran in The Age on May 1, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Leslie Cannold is a writer, columnist, ethicist and academic researcher. She is the author of the award-winning What, No Baby? and The Abortion Myth. Her historical novel The Book of Rachael was published in April by Text.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Leslie Cannold

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Leslie Cannold
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy