Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Could we have a more egalitarian society?

By Kirrily Jordan and Frank Stilwell - posted Monday, 30 April 2007


Other survey evidence indicates that public concern about inequality has increased over time. Comparing the responses from the 2003 AuSSA to earlier surveys of attitudes to income inequality shows that opposition to substantial income inequality in Australia seems to have become more widespread.

The evidence indicates a significant increase between 1994 and 2003 in the number of respondents who thought that income differences were too large. The wording of the survey questions in 2003 was a little different from that in earlier surveys, which inhibits a strong conclusion on this issue. However, it seems plausible to posit that the experience of economic inequalities over the last decade is reflected in growing disquiet about the outcome.

The latest AuSSA shows a slight decrease since 2003 in the number of people who think that income inequality is too large, but future surveys will reveal whether this marks a change in direction or just a temporary dip in the trend towards greater concern.

Advertisement

So can we realistically anticipate stronger support for policies to reduce economic inequalities?

There is some evidence that a process of change is already steadily under way. Clive Hamilton’s investigations into the growing discontent with affluenza and the incidence of downshifting, for example, lend some support to this view.

Phil Raskall, another veteran analyst of economic inequalities in Australian society, argues that there is growing interest in change, with many Australians sharing a concern that “far too much emphasis is being put on improving the economy and too little on creating a better society”.

Even Michael Keating - one of the five economists whose proposal for a lower minimum wage and tax credits got a lot of media attention a few years ago - has come out strongly advocating higher taxes to deal with inequality and provide “the public expenditure necessary to sustain our civilised society”.

While the opinion polls indicate a widespread preference for increased social spending, and even a willingness to pay the taxes necessary to fund it, politicians continue to prioritise tax cuts and to shy away from redistributive policies. This was particularly evident during the 2004 federal election campaign, in which both the Labor and Liberal Parties emphasised the Australian public’s tax burden, and vied with each other with their promises of tax cuts to “reward hard work”.

As federal treasurer for over a decade, Peter Costello has been particularly focused on emphasising tax cuts rather than more progressive redistribution: the Labor Party faces the challenge now to offer a clearly differentiated alternative.

Advertisement

In summary, there is an evident tension between widespread public disquiet about the extent of economic inequality and the reluctance of our political leaders to embrace policies that could generate more egalitarian outcomes.

While there are significant attitudinal barriers to the redress of economic inequality in Australia, they are not shared by a significant proportion of the population. The more basic problem lies in the way Australian attitudes are interpreted or represented at the political level. Changing that requires a social and political movement with a different vision for Australian society and the political will among the nation’s leadership to embrace these concerns.

Policies for a more egalitarian society need to be part of a broader program of economic, social and environmental management. This means creating growth and more equitable distribution of employment opportunities through appropriate fiscal, monetary, industry and trade policies. It also means ensuring an adequately financed program of government expenditures on public housing, social security, health and education. These are the preconditions for greater equality of access to economic opportunities. A genuinely progressive tax system is needed to generate the necessary revenues. Environmental and energy polices that ensure the sustainability of the natural environment are also necessary, combating the tendency for environmental goods to become accessible only to those with the ability to pay.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

NOTE: The issues raised in this paper are explored more fully in a forthcoming book by the authors, titled Who Gets What? Analysing Economic Inequality in Australia and to be published by Cambridge University Press in June 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

28 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Kirrily Jordan is a research assistant in Political Economy at the University of Sydney and currently undertaking a PhD in Finance and Economics at the University of Technology, Sydney.

Frank Stilwell is Professor of Political Economy at the University of Sydney. He is the coordinating editor of the Journal of Australian Political Economy. He is the author of eleven books and co-editor of four others. His new book, co-authored with Kirrily Jordan and just published by Cambridge Universty Press, is called Who Gets What? Analysing Economic Inequality in Australia.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Kirrily Jordan
All articles by Frank Stilwell

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 28 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy